Cited by 899Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classification

RNA-SeQC: RNA-seq metrics for quality control and process optimization

Open access
DeLuca, David S., Levin, Joshua Z., Sivachenko, Andrey, Fennell, Timothy, Nazaire, Marc-Danie, Williams, Chris, Reich, Michael, Winckler, Wendy +1 more·2012·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Summary: RNA-seq, the application of next-generation sequencing to RNA, provides transcriptome-wide characterization of cellular activity. Assessment of sequencing performance and library quality is critical to the interpretation of RNA-seq data, yet few tools exist to address this issue. We introduce RNA-SeQC, a program which provides key measures of data quality. These metrics include yield, alignment and duplication rates; GC bias, rRNA content, regions of alignment (exon, intron and intragenic), continuity of coverage, 3′/5′ bias and count of detectable transcripts, among others. The software provides multi-sample evaluation of library construction protocols, input materials and other experimental parameters. The modularity of the software enables pipeline integration and the routine monitoring of key measures of data quality such as the number of alignable reads, duplication rates and rRNA contamination. RNA-SeQC allows investigators to make informed decisions about sample inclusion in downstream analysis. In summary, RNA-SeQC provides quality control measures critical to experiment design, process optimization and downstream computational analysis. Availability and implementation: See www.genepattern.org to run online, or www.broadinstitute.org/rna-seqc/ for a command line tool. Contact: ddeluca@broadinstitute.org Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts196

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings confirm GC-content and insert size as recognized RNA-seq latent variables and identify gene coverage variation and error rate as additional contributions to technical variation.

    “This confirms the impact of two already recognized RNA-seq latent variables, GC-content and insert size15,22, and it also identifies two more relevant contributions to technical variation, gene coverage variation and error rate.”
  • A quality check of aligned data was done with RNA-SEQC and showed high quality alignment and data.

    “A quality check of aligned data was done with RNA-SEQC 55 and showed high quality alignment and data.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeLuca, D. S., Levin, J. Z., Sivachenko, A., Fennell, T., Nazaire, M.-D., Williams, C., Reich, M., Winckler, W., & Getz, G.
Affiliations
Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
DeLuca, David S.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2012-04-25
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
1530-1532
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2160443244
Cited by
899
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
12.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (HHSN268201000029C)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
RNA-seq quality control, sequencing metrics, GC content bias, process optimization
MeSH terms
Quality Control, RNA, RNA, Ribosomal, Software, Gene Library, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Internet, Gene Expression Profiling, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review