Cited by 283Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

A large, open source dataset of stroke anatomical brain images and manual lesion segmentations

Open access
Liew, Sook-Lei, Anglin, Julia M., Banks, Nick W., Sondag, Matt, Ito, Kaori L., Kim, Hosung, Chan, Jennifer, Ito, Joyce +27 more·2018·Scientific Data

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Stroke is the leading cause of adult disability worldwide, with up to two-thirds of individuals experiencing long-term disabilities. Large-scale neuroimaging studies have shown promise in identifying robust biomarkers (e.g., measures of brain structure) of long-term stroke recovery following rehabilitation. However, analyzing large rehabilitation-related datasets is problematic due to barriers in accurate stroke lesion segmentation. Manually-traced lesions are currently the gold standard for lesion segmentation on T1-weighted MRIs, but are labor intensive and require anatomical expertise. While algorithms have been developed to automate this process, the results often lack accuracy. Newer algorithms that employ machine-learning techniques are promising, yet these require large training datasets to optimize performance. Here we present ATLAS (Anatomical Tracings of Lesions After Stroke), an open-source dataset of 304 T1-weighted MRIs with manually segmented lesions and metadata. This large, diverse dataset can be used to train and test lesion segmentation algorithms and provides a standardized dataset for comparing the performance of different segmentation methods. We hope ATLAS release 1.1 will be a useful resource to assess and improve the accuracy of current lesion segmentation methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sdata.2018.11

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cox, R. W. et al. A (sort of) new image data format standard: Nifti-1. Neuroimage 22, e1440 (2004).
  2. Liew, S.-L. ICPSR—Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36684.v1 (2017) · DOI
  3. Liew, S.-L. Child Mind Institute https://doi.org/10.15387/fcp_indi.atlas (2017) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liew, S.-L., Anglin, J. M., Banks, N. W., Sondag, M., Ito, K. L., Kim, H., Chan, J., Ito, J., Jung, C., Khoshab, N., Lefebvre, S., Nakamura, W., Saldana, D., Schmiesing, A., Tran, C., Vo, D., Ard, T., Heydari, P., Kim, B., Aziz-Zadeh, L., Cramer, S. C., Liu, J., Soekadar, S., Nordvik, J.-E., Westlye, L. T., Wang, J., Winstein, C., Yu, C., Ai, L., Koo, B., Craddock, R. C., Milham, M., Lakich, M., Pienta, A., & Stroud, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (CN)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Sunnaas sykehus (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Child Mind Institute (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Liew, Sook-Lei
Venue
Scientific Data
Published
2018-02-20
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
180011-180011
ISSN
2052-4463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791723176
Cited by
283
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
Type
data paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Data (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH K01, P2CHD06570)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (P41EB015922)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K01HD091283, K12HD055929, P2CHD065702)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
stroke, lesion segmentation, manual segmentation, T1-weighted imaging, stroke rehabilitation, ATLAS dataset, segmentation algorithm evaluation
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Stroke, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review