Cited by 236Epigenetics and DNA MethylationCancer Cells and MetastasisAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research

Epigenetics as a mechanism driving polygenic clinical drug resistance

Open access
Glasspool, R M, Teodoridis, J M, Brown, R·2006·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Aberrant methylation of CpG islands located at or near gene promoters is associated with inactivation of gene expression during tumour development. It is increasingly recognised that such epimutations may occur at a much higher frequency than gene mutation and therefore have a greater impact on selection of subpopulations of cells during tumour progression or acquisition of resistance to anticancer drugs. Although laboratory-based models of acquired resistance to anticancer agents tend to focus on specific genes or biochemical pathways, such 'one gene:one outcome' models may be an oversimplification of acquired resistance to treatment of cancer patients. Instead, clinical drug resistance may be due to changes in expression of a large number of genes that have a cumulative impact on chemosensitivity. Aberrant CpG island methylation of multiple genes occurring in a nonrandom manner during tumour development and during the acquisition of drug resistance provides a mechanism whereby expression of multiple genes could be affected simultaneously resulting in polygenic clinical drug resistance. If simultaneous epigenetic regulation of multiple genes is indeed a major driving force behind acquired resistance of patients' tumour to anticancer agents, this has important implications for biomarker studies of clinical outcome following chemotherapy and for clinical approaches designed to circumvent or modulate drug resistance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603024

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glasspool, R. M., Teodoridis, J. M., & Brown, R.
Affiliations
Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Brown, R
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2006-02-21
Volume
94
Issue
8
Pages
1087-1092
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2085947779
Cited by
236
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Keywords
epigenetics, acquired drug resistance, CpG island methylation, promoter hypermethylation, epimutations, chemosensitivity, tumor progression, gene expression regulation, anticancer agents
MeSH terms
Genetics, Humans, CpG Islands, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, DNA Methylation, Multifactorial Inheritance, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review