Cited by 297Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeWomen's cancer prevention and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adjusting to life after treatment: distress and quality of life following treatment for breast cancer

Open access

Abstract

Clinical and anecdotal findings suggest that the completion of cancer treatment may be marked by heightened distress and disrupted adjustment. The present study examined psychological adjustment during the 3 months following treatment among 89 women with stages 0-III breast cancer. Participants completed measures of depression, cancer-related anxiety, cancer concerns, and quality of life at three time points: during treatment, 3 weeks following the end of treatment, and 3 months post-treatment. Post-treatment scores were suggestive of good psychological adjustment among the majority of women. Moreover, distress did not increase following treatment; longitudinal analyses showed no significant changes in depression or recurrence worry, while intrusive thoughts decreased, and quality of life improved. Younger age predicted greater distress across measures. A history of depression or anxiety predicted greater depressive symptomatology, while more extensive treatment predicted greater cancer-related anxiety. Despite the lack of distress endorsed on general depression and anxiety indices, participants reported moderate distress associated with cancer-related concerns, including physical problems, fear of cancer recurrence, and resuming normal life. In sum, while breast cancer survivors demonstrate good adjustment on general distress indices following treatment, some women are at risk for sustained distress. Moreover, significant cancer-related concerns are prevalent and may be important intervention targets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604091

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Age predicts intrusion, F(1,76)=12.12, P=0.001. Age is illustrated by quartiles.
Figure 1 Age predicts intrusion, F(1,76)=12.12, P=0.001. Age is illustrated by quartiles.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Education predicts intrusion, F(3,77)=6.77, P<0.001.
Figure 2 Education predicts intrusion, F(3,77)=6.77, P<0.001.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Psychiatric history predicts depression, F(1,80)=4.12, P=0.046, and the trajectory of depression over time, F(2,143)=3.50, P=0.033.
Figure 3 Psychiatric history predicts depression, F(1,80)=4.12, P=0.046, and the trajectory of depression over time, F(2,143)=3.50, P=0.033.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Adjuvant treatment predicts intrusion, F(1,81)=6.71, P=0.011.
Figure 4 Adjuvant treatment predicts intrusion, F(1,81)=6.71, P=0.011.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. SF-36.org (1998) 1998 SF-36 Normative Data Vol. 2006
  2. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE (2000) How to Score Version Two of the SF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric, Incorporated

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Costanzo, E. S., Lutgendorf, S. K., Mattes, M. L., Trehan, S., Robinson, C. B., Tewfik, F., & Roman, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Aultman Hospital (US)
  • Trinity Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Costanzo, E S
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2007-11-13
Volume
97
Issue
12
Pages
1625-1631
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W1968391143
Cited by
297
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 23
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Psychological Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
breast cancer survivors, psychological adjustment, quality of life, depression, cancer-related anxiety, fear of cancer recurrence, intrusive thoughts, age as risk factor, treatment burden
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Breast Neoplasms, Depression, Female, Forecasting, Humans, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review