Cited by 178Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Primary resistance to cetuximab therapy in EGFR FISH-positive colorectal cancer patients

Open access
Cappuzzo, F, Varella-Garcia, M, Finocchiaro, G, Skokan, M, Gajapathy, S, Carnaghi, C, Rimassa, L, Rossi, E +9 more·2008·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

The impact of KRAS mutations on cetuximab sensitivity in epidermal growth factor receptor fluorescence in situ hybridisation-positive (EGFR FISH+) metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC) has not been previously investigated. In the present study, we analysed KRAS, BRAF, PI3KCA, MET, and IGF1R in 85 mCRC treated with cetuximab-based therapy in whom EGFR status was known. KRAS mutations (52.5%) negatively affected response only in EGFR FISH+ patients. EGFR FISH+/KRAS mutated had a significantly lower response rate (P=0.04) than EGFR FISH+/KRAS wild type patients. Four EGFR FISH+ patients with KRAS mutations responded to cetuximab therapy. BRAF was mutated in 5.0% of patients and none responded to the therapy. PI3KCA mutations (17.7%) were not associated to cetuximab sensitivity. Patients overexpressing IGF1R (74.3%) had significantly longer survival than patients with low IGF1R expression (P=0.006), with no difference in response rate. IGF1R gene amplification was not detected, and only two (2.6%) patients, both responders, had MET gene amplification. In conclusion, KRAS mutations are associated with cetuximab failure in EGFR FISH+ mCRC, even if it does not preclude response. The rarity of MET and IGF1R gene amplification suggests a marginal role in primary resistance. The potential prognostic implication of IGF1R expression merits further evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604439

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cappuzzo, F., Varella-Garcia, M., Finocchiaro, G., Skokan, M., Gajapathy, S., Carnaghi, C., Rimassa, L., Rossi, E., Ligorio, C., Di Tommaso, L., Holmes, A. J., Toschi, L., Tallini, G., Destro, A., Roncalli, M., Santoro, A., & Jänne, P. A.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT)
  • University of Colorado Cancer Center (US)
  • Ospedale Bellaria (IT)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Cappuzzo, F
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2008-06-24
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
83-89
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2105904851
Cited by
178
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
14.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Center, University of Colorado
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
cetuximab, primary drug resistance, metastatic colorectal cancer, KRAS mutation, MET amplification, PIK3CA mutation, BRAF mutation, predictive biomarkers
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nuclear Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Transcription Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Receptors, Somatomedin, Receptors, Growth Factor, ras Proteins, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review