Cited by 2,229Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

KRAS Mutation Status Is Predictive of Response to Cetuximab Therapy in Colorectal Cancer

Lièvre, Astrid, Bachet, Jean-Baptiste, Le Corre, Delphine, Boige, Valérie, Landi, Bruno, Emile, Jean-François, Côté, Jean-François, Tomasic, Gorana +5 more·2006·Cancer Research

Abstract

The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) cetuximab has been proven to be efficient in metastatic colorectal cancer. The molecular mechanisms underlying the clinical response to this drug remain unknown. Genetic alterations of the intracellular effectors involved in EGFR-related signaling pathways may have an effect on response to this targeted therapy. In this study, tumors from 30 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated by cetuximab were screened for KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutation by direct sequencing and for EGFR copy number by chromogenic in situ hybridization. Eleven of the 30 patients (37%) responded to cetuximab. A KRAS mutation was found in 13 tumors (43%) and was significantly associated with the absence of response to cetuximab (KRAS mutation in 0% of the 11 responder patients versus 68.4% of the 19 nonresponder patients; P = 0.0003). The overall survival of patients without KRAS mutation in their tumor was significantly higher compared with those patients with a mutated tumor (P = 0.016; median, 16.3 versus 6.9 months). An increased EGFR copy number was found in 3 patients (10%) and was significantly associated with an objective tumor response to cetuximab (P = 0.04). In conclusion, in this study, KRAS mutations are a predictor of resistance to cetuximab therapy and are associated with a worse prognosis. The EGFR amplification, which is not as frequent as initially reported, is also associated with response to this treatment. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(8): 3992-5)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0191

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lièvre, A., Bachet, J.-B., Le Corre, D., Boige, V., Landi, B., Emile, J.-F., Côté, J.-F., Tomasic, G., Penna, C., Ducreux, M., Rougier, P., Penault-Llorca, F., & Laurent-Puig, P.
Affiliations
  • 1Université Paris-Descartes, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale UMR-775;
  • Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR)
  • 4Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and
  • Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR)
  • 3Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne Billancourt, France, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France;
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
  • 5Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France, Université Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2006-04-15
Volume
66
Issue
8
Pages
3992-3995
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2164837623
Cited by
2,229
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 137 · 2015: 152 · 2014: 145 · 2013: 145 · 2012: 157
FWCI
70.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
KRAS mutation, cetuximab, metastatic colorectal cancer, EGFR, predictive biomarkers, treatment response, BRAF mutation, PIK3CA mutation, overall survival, drug resistance
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Female, Gene Amplification, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Predictive Value of Tests, Genes, ras, Colorectal Neoplasms, Gene Dosage, Genes, erbB-1, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review