Cited by 89Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesGenetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Concordance of predictive markers for EGFR inhibitors in primary tumors and metastases in colorectal cancer: A review

Open access
Baas, Jara M., Krens, Lisanne L., Guchelaar, Henk-Jan, Morreau, Hans, Gelderblom, Hans·2011·The Oncologist

Abstract

Background.: Currently, only Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutational status is used as a decisional marker for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Concordance of KRAS status between primary tumors and metastases has always been considered to be close to perfect; however, cases of discordance have been reported. The actual rate of concordance of KRAS status remains unclear, as is the same for v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase CA subunit (PIK3CA), and loss of phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome ten (PTEN). Therefore, it is unknown whether it is necessary to perform mutational analysis on metastases instead of on (or in addition to) primary tumors. Design.: A systematic literature search was conducted to collect all studies testing concordance of KRAS in CRC, and also of BRAF, PIK3CA, and loss of PTEN. Results.: Twenty-one studies have reported concordance of KRAS, with an overall concordance rate of 93% (range, 76%–100%). Overall concordance rates of studies testing concordance of BRAF status and loss of PTEN were 98% and 68%, respectively. Three studies reported concordance of PIK3CA status (range, 89%–94%). Conclusion.: Though discordance of KRAS status does occur, it is uncommon. When considering the downsides of testing metastatic tissue in all patients along with the low incidence of discordance, we conclude that that testing the primary tumor (or whatever tissue available) is sufficient for clinical decision making on EGFR inhibitor therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0024

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Albitar M, Yeh C, Ma W. K-ras mutations and cetuximab in colorectal can- cer. N Engl J Med 2009;360:834; author reply 835-836.
  2. Tol J, Nagtegaal ID, Punt CJ. BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal can- cer. N Engl J Med 2009;361:98 -99.
  3. Finkelstein SD, Sayegh R, Christensen S et al. Genotypic classification of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Biologic behavior correlates with K-ras-2 mu- tation type. Cancer 1993;71:3827-3838.
  4. Al-Mulla F, Going JJ, Sowden ET et al. Heterogeneity of mutant versus wild-type Ki-ras in primary and metastatic colorectal carcinomas, and as- sociation of codon-12 valine with early mortality. J Pathol 1998;185:130 - 138.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baas, J. M., Krens, L. L., Guchelaar, H.-J., Morreau, H., & Gelderblom, H.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Morreau, Hans
Venue
The Oncologist
Published
2011-07-08
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
1239-1249
ISSN
  • 1083-7159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-490X
OpenAlex
W2160662474
Cited by
89
References
68
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Oncologist (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Amgen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
colorectal cancer, EGFR inhibitors, predictive biomarkers, KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, PIK3CA mutation, PTEN loss
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasm Metastasis, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), ras Proteins, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review