The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
International consensus for neuroblastoma molecular diagnostics: report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Biology Committee
Open accessAbstract
Neuroblastoma serves as a paradigm for utilising tumour genomic data for determining patient prognosis and treatment allocation. However, before the establishment of the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Task Force in 2004, international consensus on markers, methodology, and data interpretation did not exist, compromising the reliability of decisive genetic markers and inhibiting translational research efforts. The objectives of the INRG Biology Committee were to identify highly prognostic genetic aberrations to be included in the new INRG risk classification schema and to develop precise definitions, decisive biomarkers, and technique standardisation. The review of the INRG database (n=8800 patients) by the INRG Task Force finally enabled the identification of the most significant neuroblastoma biomarkers. In addition, the Biology Committee compared the standard operating procedures of different cooperative groups to arrive at international consensus for methodology, nomenclature, and future directions. Consensus was reached to include MYCN status, 11q23 allelic status, and ploidy in the INRG classification system on the basis of an evidence-based review of the INRG database. Standardised operating procedures for analysing these genetic factors were adopted, and criteria for proper nomenclature were developed. Neuroblastoma treatment planning is highly dependant on tumour cell genomic features, and it is likely that a comprehensive panel of DNA-based biomarkers will be used in future risk assignment algorithms applying genome-wide techniques. Consensus on methodology and interpretation is essential for uniform INRG classification and will greatly facilitate international and cooperative clinical and translational research studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures
Peto, R., & Peto, J. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344317 · Cited by 3,393
Asgharzadeh, S., Pique-Regi, R., Sposto, R., Wang, H., Yang, Y., Shimada, H., Matthay, K., Buckley, J., Ortega, A., & Seeger, R. C. (2006) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djj330 · Cited by 237
Ohira, M., Oba, S., Nakamura, Y., Isogai, E., Kaneko, S., Nakagawa, A., Hirata, T., Kubo, H., Goto, T., Yamada, S., et al. (2005) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.019 · Cited by 155
Self-citation
Cited by
Park, J. R., Bagatell, R., Cohn, S. L., Pearson, A. D., Villablanca, J. G., Berthold, F., Burchill, S., Boubaker, A., McHugh, K., Nuchtern, J. G., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.72.0177 · Cited by 365
Self-citationLondon, W. B., Castel, V., Monclair, T., Ambros, P. F., Pearson, A. D. J., Cohn, S. L., Berthold, F., Nakagawara, A., Ladenstein, R. L., Iehara, T., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2010.34.3392 · Cited by 318
Self-citationCasinelli, G., LaRosa, J., Sharma, M., Cherok, E., Banerjee, S., Branca, M., Edmunds, L., Wang, Y., Sims-Lucas, S., Churley, L., et al. (2016) · Cell Death Discovery · doi:10.1038/cddiscovery.2016.82 · Cited by 52
Montuori, G., Tu, F., Qin, D., Schmargon, R., Rodriguez-Fos, E., Helmsauer, K., Hui, H., Mandal, S., Purshouse, K., Fankhänel, L., et al. (2025) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-24-1738 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Ambros, P. F., Ambros, I. M., Brodeur, G. M., Haber, M., Khan, J., Nakagawara, A., Schleiermacher, G., Speleman, F., Spitz, R., London, W. B., Cohn, S. L., Pearson, A. D. J., & Maris, J. M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2009-04-28
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1471-1482
- ISSN
- 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-1827
- OpenAlex
- W2033037904
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International consensus for neuroblastoma molecular diagnostics: report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Biology Committee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605014
- The paper
- Ambros, P. F., Ambros, I. M., Brodeur, G. M., Haber, M., Khan, J., Nakagawara, A., Schleiermacher, G., Speleman, F., Spitz, R., London, W. B., Cohn, S. L., Pearson, A. D. J., & Maris, J. M. (2009). International consensus for neuroblastoma molecular diagnostics: report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Biology Committee. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.