Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic value of Dicer expression in human breast cancers and association with the mesenchymal phenotype

Open access
Grelier, G, Voirin, N, Ay, A-S, Cox, D G, Chabaud, S, Treilleux, I, Léon-Goddard, S, Rimokh, R, Mikaelian, I, Venoux, C, Puisieux, A, Lasset, C, Moyret-Lalle, C·2009·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dicer, a ribonuclease, is the key enzyme required for the biogenesis of microRNAs and small interfering RNAs and is essential for both mammalian development and cell differentiation. Recent evidence indicates that Dicer may also be involved in tumourigenesis. However, no studies have examined the clinical significance of Dicer at both the RNA and the protein levels in breast cancer. METHODS: In this study, the biological and prognostic value of Dicer expression was assessed in breast cancer cell lines, breast cancer progression cellular models, and in two well-characterised sets of breast carcinoma samples obtained from patients with long-term follow-up using tissue microarrays and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. RESULTS: We have found that Dicer protein expression is significantly associated with hormone receptor status and cancer subtype in breast tumours (ER P=0.008; PR P=0.019; cancer subtype P=0.023, luminal A P=0.0174). Dicer mRNA expression appeared to have an independent prognostic impact in metastatic disease (hazard ratio=3.36, P=0.0032). In the breast cancer cell lines, lower Dicer expression was found in cells harbouring a mesenchymal phenotype and in metastatic bone derivatives of a breast cancer cell line. These findings suggest that the downregulation of Dicer expression may be related to the metastatic spread of tumours. CONCLUSION: Assessment of Dicer expression may facilitate prediction of distant metastases for patients suffering from breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605193

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Grelier, G., Voirin, N., Ay, A.-S., Cox, D. G., Chabaud, S., Treilleux, I., Léon-Goddard, S., Rimokh, R., Mikaelian, I., Venoux, C., Puisieux, A., Lasset, C., & Moyret-Lalle, C.
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2009-08
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
673-683
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2019805139
Cited by
198
References
5
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic value of Dicer expression in human breast cancers and association with the mesenchymal phenotype. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605193
The paper
Grelier, G., Voirin, N., Ay, A.-S., Cox, D. G., Chabaud, S., Treilleux, I., Léon-Goddard, S., Rimokh, R., Mikaelian, I., Venoux, C., Puisieux, A., Lasset, C., & Moyret-Lalle, C. (2009). Prognostic value of Dicer expression in human breast cancers and association with the mesenchymal phenotype. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605193

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.