The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: applications to targets and beyond
Open accessAbstract
Computational (in silico) methods have been developed and widely applied to pharmacology hypothesis development and testing. These in silico methods include databases, quantitative structure‐activity relationships, similarity searching, pharmacophores, homology models and other molecular modeling, machine learning, data mining, network analysis tools and data analysis tools that use a computer. Such methods have seen frequent use in the discovery and optimization of novel molecules with affinity to a target, the clarification of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity properties as well as physicochemical characterization. The first part of this review discussed the methods that have been used for virtual ligand and target‐based screening and profiling to predict biological activity. The aim of this second part of the review is to illustrate some of the varied applications of in silico methods for pharmacology in terms of the targets addressed. We will also discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of in silico methods with respect to in vitro and in vivo methods for pharmacology research. Our conclusion is that the in silico pharmacology paradigm is ongoing and presents a rich array of opportunities that will assist in expediating the discovery of new targets, and ultimately lead to compounds with predicted biological activity for these novel targets. British Journal of Pharmacology(2007)152, 21–37; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0707306
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration
Wishart, D. S. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj067 · Cited by 3,892
Cited by
Reducing safety-related drug attrition: the use of in vitro pharmacological profiling
Bowes, J., Brown, A. J., Hamon, J., Jarolimek, W., Sridhar, A., Waldron, G., & Whitebread, S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3845 · Cited by 748
Recognizing Pitfalls in Virtual Screening: A Critical Review
Scior, T., Bender, A., Tresadern, G., Medina-Franco, J. L., Martínez-Mayorga, K., Langer, T., Cuanalo-Contreras, K., & Agrafiotis, D. K. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200528d · Cited by 438
Protein structure prediction: when is it useful?
Zhang, Y. (2009) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2009.02.005 · Cited by 277
Reactions and enzymes in the metabolism of drugs and other xenobiotics
Testa, B., Pedretti, A., & Vistoli, G. (2012) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2012.01.017 · Cited by 254
Krasowski, M. D., Drees, D., Morris, C. S., Maakestad, J., Blau, J. L., & Ekins, S. (2014) · BMC Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1186/1472-6890-14-33 · Cited by 212
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ekins, S., Mestres, J., & Testa, B.
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-37
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- OpenAlex
- W2041133307
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.