Cited by 1,360Nutritional Studies and DietAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactNutrition, Health, and Society Studies

Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets

Melina, Vesanto, Craig, Winston, Levin, Susan·2016·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

It is the position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics that appropriately planned vegetarian, including vegan, diets are healthful, nutritionally adequate, and may provide health benefits for the prevention and treatment of certain diseases. These diets are appropriate for all stages of the life cycle, including pregnancy, lactation, infancy, childhood, adolescence, older adulthood, and for athletes. Plant-based diets are more environmentally sustainable than diets rich in animal products because they use fewer natural resources and are associated with much less environmental damage. Vegetarians and vegans are at reduced risk of certain health conditions, including ischemic heart disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, certain types of cancer, and obesity. Low intake of saturated fat and high intakes of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, legumes, soy products, nuts, and seeds (all rich in fiber and phytochemicals) are characteristics of vegetarian and vegan diets that produce lower total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and better serum glucose control. These factors contribute to reduction of chronic disease. Vegans need reliable sources of vitamin B-12, such as fortified foods or supplements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.025

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melina, V., Craig, W., & Levin, S.
Affiliations
  • Andrews University (US)
  • Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
116
Issue
12
Pages
1970-1980
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2549537750
Cited by
1,360
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 108 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 232 · 2021: 201 · 2020: 146 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
70.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - Andrews University (Andrews University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Keywords
vegetarian diet, vegan diet, plant-based diet, nutritional adequacy, disease prevention, environmental sustainability, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, cancer risk, obesity, cholesterol, serum glucose, vitamin B12, life cycle nutrition, athletes
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dietetics, Humans, Hypertension, Neoplasms, Nutritional Requirements, Obesity, Societies, Scientific, Diet, Vegetarian, Myocardial Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review