Cited by 100Muscle metabolism and nutritionAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyNutrition, Health, and Society Studies

An adaptive metabolic demand model for protein and amino acid requirements

Open access
Millward, D. J.·2003·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

The shortcomings of the metabolic implications of the current protein requirements model are reviewed, and an alternative model, validated with [1-13 C]leucine balance results in human adults, is presented and evaluated in the context of defining protein requirements. The model identifies metabolic demands for amino acids as comprising a small fixed component and a variable adaptive component that is relatively insensitive to acute food or protein intake, but which changes slowly with a sustained change in intake, enabling N equilibrium to be achieved. The model accounts for the apparent low efficiency of utilisation of animal proteins in N balance studies and enables more realistic efficiency values to be measured within an experimental framework that takes account of the adaptive metabolic demand. However, the complex relationship between the adaptive metabolic demand and habitual level and quality of protein intake prevents prediction of protein quality by amino acid scoring, which can markedly underestimate actual values. In contrast to the current model, for fully adapted individuals risk of deficiency (i.e. negative N balance after complete adaptation) will only start to increase when intakes fall below the range of the true minimum requirements, i.e. a value that is currently unknown, but likely to be between 0·40 and 0·50 g/kg per d at the lower end of the reported distribution of requirements. At intakes greater than this with additional metabolic demands varying directly with intake, deficiency is only likely as a short-term response to a change to a lower intake within the adaptive range. Thus, for adults satisfying energy needs on most mixed human diets, intakes will be within the adaptive range, and N equilibrium ceases to be a useful indicator of nutritional adequacy of protein. In the context of prescriptive dietary guidelines it may be expedient to retain current values until the benefits (and any risks) of protein intakes within the adaptive range can be quantified. However, from a diagnostic perspective, indicators other than N balance need to be identified, since maintenance of N balance can no longer be used as a surrogate of adequate protein-related health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn2003924

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Institute of Medicine (2000) Dietary Reference Intakes: Application in Dietary Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  2. Institute of Medicine (2002) Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  3. Young VR & Borgonha S (1998) Nutritional adaptation (genetic, physiological and behavioural): Implications for requirements. In From Nutritional Science to Nutrition Policy for Better Global Health, pp. 57-160 [DW Fitzpatrick, JE Anderson and ML L'Abbe, editors]. Ottowa: Canadian Federation of Biological Societies.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millward, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Millward, D. J.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2003-08
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
249-260
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2115256296
Cited by
100
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Keywords
protein requirements, amino acid requirements, nitrogen balance, protein quality, protein deficiency, dietary guidelines
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Amino Acids, Dietary Proteins, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Leucine, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Nitrogen, Reference Values, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review