Cited by 58Algal biology and biofuel productionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionFluid Dynamics and Mixing

Extracellular production of L-ascorbic acid by Chlorella protothecoides, Prototheca species, and mutants of P. moriformis during aerobic culturing at low pH

Open access
Running, JA, Severson, DK, Schneider, KJ·2002·Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

Nine strains of Chlorella protothecoides and 43 strains representing the five species of Prototheca were screened in flask culture for their ability to synthesize L-ascorbic acid (AA). Ascorbic acid was detected in all strains, ranging from 4.8 to 0.38 mg AA g x (-1) of dry cells. Organisms selected for further study grew well and maintained their AA productivity above a pH of 3.5. They can produce AA using a variety of carbon and nitrogen sources. Aerobic fermentation of selected strains resulted in extracellular accumulation of AA up to 76 mg x l(-1). By classical mutagenesis and selection methods, we created mutants of Prototheca moriformis ATCC 75669 that produced greater quantities of AA than the wild-type strain (78.4 vs 21.9 mg AA g x (-1) of cells). A process based on extracellular production could greatly reduce the cost of AA manufacture by eliminating the need for extraction of the AA from the cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.jim.7000275

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jaffe GM. 1984. Ascorbic acid. In: Grayson M (Ed), Kirk -Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York, pp. 8 - 40.
  2. Pore RS. 1993. Prototheca Kruger. In: Kurtzman CP and JW Fell (Eds), The Yeasts. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 883 -888.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Running, J., Severson, D., & Schneider, K.
Affiliations
Bio-Technical Resources (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2002-08-01
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
93-98
ISSN
  • 1367-5435 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5535
OpenAlex
W1970571467
Cited by
58
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Keywords
vitamin C, Chlorella protothecoides, Prototheca, aerobic fermentation, mutant strain, mutagenesis, carbon and nitrogen sources, vitamin C production
MeSH terms
Aerobiosis, Ascorbic Acid, Chlorella, Culture Media, Fermentation, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Magnesium, Mutation, Prototheca, Selection, Genetic, Temperature, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review