The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How dopamine dysregulation leads to psychotic symptoms? Abnormal mesolimbic and mesostriatal prediction error signalling in psychosis
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the extent of the observed conduction delays were found to be dependent on the frequency of stimulation, with high frequency stimulation resulting in larger and more variable conduction delays than low frequency stimulation.”
From Schizophrenia, myelination, and delayed corollary discharges: a hypothesis (2012) · cites this paper as [77]
In the citing paper
“Rasminsky and Sears 77 experimentally dysmyelinated the ventral roots of the spinal cord in rats and found that the conduction velocities of impulses traveling along these fibers were both slower and abnormally variable compared with impulses traveling along healthy fibers.”
From Schizophrenia, myelination, and delayed corollary discharges: a hypothesis (2012) · cites this paper as [77]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Os, J., Rutten, B. P., & Poulton, R. (2008) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn117 · Cited by 713
Palaniyappan, L., & Liddle, P. F. (2012) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.100176 · Cited by 548
Neural correlates of value, risk, and risk aversion contributing to decision making under risk
Christopoulos, G. I., Tobler, P. N., Bossaerts, P., Dolan, R. J., & Schultz, W. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2614-09.2009 · Cited by 451
“Ventral striatum ROI was hand drawn in MRIcro (Rorden and Brett, 2000) according to the anatomical description by Martinez et al. (2003), as used previously (Murray et al., 2008), adjusted to the anatomical specificities of our sample.”
Voon, V., Mole, T. B., Banca, P., Porter, L., Morris, L., Mitchell, S., Lapa, T. R., Karr, J., Harrison, N. A., Potenza, M. N., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102419 · Cited by 462
A Review of Reward Processing and Motivational Impairment in Schizophrenia
Strauss, G. P., Waltz, J. A., & Gold, J. M. (2013) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbt197 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, G. K., Corlett, P. R., Clark, L., Pessiglione, M., Blackwell, A. D., Honey, G., Jones, P. B., Bullmore, E. T., Robbins, T. W., & Fletcher, P. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
- Venue
- Molecular Psychiatry
- Published
- 2008-02-19
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 239-239
- ISSN
- 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5578
- OpenAlex
- W2032074381
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- dopamine dysregulation, psychosis, mesolimbic system, mesostriatal pathway, reward prediction error, dopamine signaling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
