Does Prenatal Nicotine Exposure Sensitize the Brain to Nicotine-Induced Neurotoxicity in Adolescence?
Abstract
Offspring of women who smoke during pregnancy are themselves more likely to take up smoking in adolescence. We evaluated neurotoxicant effects of prenatal and adolescent nicotine exposure in developing rats to evaluate whether these contribute to a biological basis for this relationship. Rats were given nicotine or vehicle throughout pregnancy and the offspring then again received nicotine or vehicle during adolescence (postnatal days PN30-47.5); this regimen reproduces the plasma nicotine levels found in smokers. Indices of neural cell number (DNA concentration and content), cell size (protein/DNA ratio), and cell membrane surface area (membrane/total protein) were then evaluated in brain regions during adolescent nicotine administration (PN45) and up to 1 month post-treatment. By itself, prenatal nicotine administration produced cellular alterations that persisted into adolescence, characterized by net cell losses in the midbrain and to a lesser extent, in the cerebral cortex, with corresponding elevations in the membrane/total protein ratio. The hippocampus showed a unique response, with increased DNA content and regional enlargement. Adolescent nicotine treatment alone had similar, albeit smaller effects, but also showed sex-dependence, with effects on protein biomarkers preferential to females. When animals exposed to nicotine prenatally were then given nicotine in adolescence, the net outcome was worsened, largely representing summation of the two individual effects. Our results indicate that prenatal nicotine exposure alters parameters of cell development lasting into adolescence, where the effects add to those elicited directly by adolescent nicotine; neurotoxicant actions may thus contribute to the association between maternal smoking and subsequent smoking in the offspring.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PNE administration produced cellular alterations including net cell losses in the midbrain and regional enlargement of the hippocampus.
“found the PNE administration produced cellular alternations including net cell losses in the midbrain, and regional enlargement of the hippocampus [164].”
From Prenatal nicotine exposure during pregnancy results in adverse neurodevelopmental alterations and neurobehavioral deficits (2023) · cites this paper as [164]
Animals exposed to nicotine prenatally and given nicotine during adolescence had worse outcomes and greater neurotoxicity compared to controls.
“Interestingly, they found that animals exposed to nicotine prenatally and given nicotine during adolescence had worse outcomes and greater neurotoxicity as compared to controls”
From Prenatal nicotine exposure during pregnancy results in adverse neurodevelopmental alterations and neurobehavioral deficits (2023) · cites this paper as [164]
Neurotoxicant actions may contribute towards the association between PNE and subsequent smoking in offspring.
“indicating the neurotoxicant actions may contribute towards the association between PNE and subsequent smoking in offspring.”
From Prenatal nicotine exposure during pregnancy results in adverse neurodevelopmental alterations and neurobehavioral deficits (2023) · cites this paper as [164]
Cites
Altman, J., & Bayer, S. A. (1990) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903010304 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Slotkin, T. A. (2004) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2003.06.001 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Self-citationLuck, W., Nau, H., Hansen, R., & Steldinger, R. (2017) · Developmental Pharmacology and Therapeutics · doi:10.1159/000457063 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Cigarette Smoking and Plasma Levels of Nicotine
ISAAC, P. F., & RAND, M. J. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/236308a0 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Abreu-Villaça, Y., Seidler, F. J., Qiao, D., Tate, C. A., Cousins, M. M., Thillai, I., & Slotkin, T. A. (2003) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300221 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-citationKlein, L. C. (2001) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/1064-1297.9.3.251 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Slotkin, T. A. (2008) · Neurotoxicology and Teratology · doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2007.09.002 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuroimaging of children following prenatal drug exposure
Derauf, C., Kekatpure, M., Neyzi, N., Lester, B., & Kosofsky, B. (2009) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.03.001 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Oliveira‐da‐Silva, A., Vieira, F. B., Cristina‐Rodrigues, F., Filgueiras, C. C., Manhães, A. C., & Abreu‐Villaça, Y. (2009) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2009.06.009 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationWells, A. C., & Lotfipour, S. (2023) · Advances in Drug and Alcohol Research · doi:10.3389/adar.2023.11628 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“Another study in rats evaluated the neurotoxicant effects of prenatal and adolescent nicotine exposure and found the PNE administration produced cellular alternations including net cell losses in the midbrain, and regional enlargement of the hippocampus [164].”
BackgroundRibeiro-Carvalho, A., Lima, C. S., Medeiros, A. H., Siqueira, N. R., Filgueiras, C. C., Manhães, A. C., & Abreu-Villaça, Y. (2009) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.05.032 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationSlotkin, T. A., Bodwell, B. E., Ryde, I. T., & Seidler, F. J. (2008) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.12.009 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationZugno, A. I., Fraga, D. B., De Luca, R. D., Ghedim, F. V., Deroza, P. F., Cipriano, A. L., Oliveira, M. B., Heylmann, A. S. A., Budni, J., Souza, R. P., et al. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.02.001 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Effects of pre-and neonatal nicotine exposure in rodents: inconsistent evidence
Sobrian, S. K., & Holson, R. R. (2011) · ILAR Journal · doi:10.1093/ilar.52.3.251 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Abreu-Villaça, Y., Seidler, F. J., & Slotkin, T. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Slotkin, Theodore A
- ORCID
- Slotkin, Theodore A
- Venue
- Neuropsychopharmacology
- Published
- 2004-03-24
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1440-1450
- ISSN
- 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
- 1740-634X
- OpenAlex
- W2044481346
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Keywords
- prenatal nicotine exposure, adolescent nicotine exposure, maternal smoking, cerebral cortex, sex differences, brain development
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Body Weight, Brain, DNA, Female, Male, Membrane Proteins, Mesencephalon, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neuroglia, Neurons, Nicotine, Organ Size, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Neurites, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Neurotoxicity Syndromes, Cell Size, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review