Cited by 70Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsSmoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Does Prenatal Nicotine Exposure Sensitize the Brain to Nicotine-Induced Neurotoxicity in Adolescence?

Abreu-Villaça, Yael, Seidler, Frederic J, Slotkin, Theodore A·2004·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Offspring of women who smoke during pregnancy are themselves more likely to take up smoking in adolescence. We evaluated neurotoxicant effects of prenatal and adolescent nicotine exposure in developing rats to evaluate whether these contribute to a biological basis for this relationship. Rats were given nicotine or vehicle throughout pregnancy and the offspring then again received nicotine or vehicle during adolescence (postnatal days PN30-47.5); this regimen reproduces the plasma nicotine levels found in smokers. Indices of neural cell number (DNA concentration and content), cell size (protein/DNA ratio), and cell membrane surface area (membrane/total protein) were then evaluated in brain regions during adolescent nicotine administration (PN45) and up to 1 month post-treatment. By itself, prenatal nicotine administration produced cellular alterations that persisted into adolescence, characterized by net cell losses in the midbrain and to a lesser extent, in the cerebral cortex, with corresponding elevations in the membrane/total protein ratio. The hippocampus showed a unique response, with increased DNA content and regional enlargement. Adolescent nicotine treatment alone had similar, albeit smaller effects, but also showed sex-dependence, with effects on protein biomarkers preferential to females. When animals exposed to nicotine prenatally were then given nicotine in adolescence, the net outcome was worsened, largely representing summation of the two individual effects. Our results indicate that prenatal nicotine exposure alters parameters of cell development lasting into adolescence, where the effects add to those elicited directly by adolescent nicotine; neurotoxicant actions may thus contribute to the association between maternal smoking and subsequent smoking in the offspring.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1300443

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abreu-Villaça, Y., Seidler, F. J., & Slotkin, T. A.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Slotkin, Theodore A
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2004-03-24
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1440-1450
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2044481346
Cited by
70
References
6
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
prenatal nicotine exposure, adolescent nicotine exposure, maternal smoking, cerebral cortex, sex differences, brain development
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Body Weight, Brain, DNA, Female, Male, Membrane Proteins, Mesencephalon, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neuroglia, Neurons, Nicotine, Organ Size, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Neurites, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Neurotoxicity Syndromes, Cell Size, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review