CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 151

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deterministic entanglement distillation for secure double-server blind quantum computation

Sheng, Yu-Bo, Zhou, Lan·2015·Scientific Reports
DOI 10.1038/srep07815PMC PMC4295105
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep07815

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2004, a single-mode discrete teleportation scheme using a quantum dot single-photon source was demonstrated.

    “In 2004, for instance, a single-mode discrete teleportation scheme using a quantum dot single-photon source has been demonstrated [345].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [345]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Childs, A. M. Secure assisted quantum computation. Quantum Info. Comput. 5, 456–466 (2005).
  2. Arrighi, P. & Salvail, L. . Blind quantum computation. Int. J. Quantum Inform. 4, 883–898 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Broadbent, A., Fitzsimons, J. & Kashefi, E. Universal blind quantum computation. Proceedings of the 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 517–526 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Morimae, T., Dunjko, V. & Kashefi, E. Ground state blind quantum computation on AKLT state. arXiv: 1009.3486 (2010). · arXiv
  5. Morimae, T. & Fujii, K. Blind topological measurement-based quantum computation. Nat. Commun. 3, 1036 (2012). · DOI
  6. Fitzsimons, J. & Kashefi, E. Unconditionally verifiable blind computation. arXiv: 1203.5217 (2012). · arXiv
  7. Morimae, T. Continuous-variable blind quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 230502 (2012). · DOI
  8. Dunjko, V., Kashefi, E. & Leverrier, A. Blind quantum computing with weak coherent pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 200502 (2012). · DOI
  9. Morimae, T. & Fujii, K. Blind quantum computation protocol in which Alice only makes measurements. Phys. Rev. A 87, 050301(R) (2013). · DOI
  10. Sueki, T., Koshiba, T. & Morimae, T. Ancilla-driven universal blind quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 87, 060301(R) (2013). · DOI
  11. Morimae, T. & Fujii, K. Secure entanglement distillation for double-server blind quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 020502 (2013). · DOI
  12. Giovannetti, V., Maccone, L., Morimae, T. & Rudolph, T. G. Efficient universal blind quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 230501 (2013). · DOI
  13. Mantri, A., Delgado, C. A. P. & Fitzsimons, J. F. Optimal blind quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 230502 (2013). · DOI
  14. Li, Q., Chan, W. H., Wu, C. & Wen, Z. Triple-Sever blind quantum computation using entanglement swapping. Phys. Rev. A 89, 040302(R) (2014). · DOI
  15. Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188–5191 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bennett, C. H. et al. Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 722–725 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A. & Wootters, W. K. Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824–3851 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Deutsch, D. et al. Quantum privacy amplification and the security of quantum cryptography over noisy channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2818–2821 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  19. Pan, J. W., Simon, C. & Zellinger, A. Entanglement purification for quantum communication. Nature 410, 1067–1070 (2001). · DOI
  20. Pan, J. W. et al. Experimental entanglement purification of arbitrary unknown states. Nature 423, 417–422 (2003). · DOI
  21. Simon, C. & Pan, J. W. Polarization entanglement purification using spatial entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 257901 (2002). · DOI
  22. Martín-Delgado, M. A. & Navascués, M. Entanglement distillation protocols and number theory. Phys. Rev. A 68, 012322 (2003). · DOI
  23. Sheng, Y. B., Deng, F. G. & Zhou, H. Y. Efficient polarization-entanglement purification based on parametric down-conversion sources with cross-Kerr nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. A 77, 042308 (2008). · DOI
  24. Sheng, Y. B. & Deng, F. G. Deterministic entanglement purification and complete nonlocal Bell-state analysis with hyperentanglement. Phys. Rev. A 81, 032307 (2010). · DOI
  25. Li, X. H. Deterministic polarization-entanglement purification using spatial entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 82, 044304 (2010). · DOI
  26. Deng, F. G. One-step error correction for multipartite polarization entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 83, 062316 (2011). · DOI
  27. Wang, C., Zhang, Y. & Jin, G. S. Entanglement purification and concentration of electron-spin entangled states using quantum-dot spins in optical microcavities. Phys. Rev. A 84, 032307 (2011). · DOI
  28. Gonta, D. & van Loock, P. Dynamical entanglement purification using chains of atoms and optical cavities. Phys. Rev. A 84, 042303 (2011). · DOI
  29. Gonta, D. & van Loock, P. High-fidelity entanglement purification using chains of atoms and optical cavities. Phys. Rev. A 86, 052312 (2012). · DOI
  30. Barreiro, J. T., Langford, N. K., Peters, N. A. & Kwiat, P. G. Generation of hyperentangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 260501 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  31. Schuck, C., Huber, G., Kurtsiefer, C. & Weinfurter, H. Complete deterministic linear optics bell state analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 190501 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  32. Wei, T. C., Barreiro, J. T. & Kwiat, P. G. Hyperentangled Bell-state analysis. Phys. Rev. A 75, 060305(R) (2007). · DOI
  33. Barreiro, J. T., Wei, T. C. & Kwiat, P. G. Beating the channel capacity limit for linear photonic superdense coding. Nat. Phys. 4, 282–286 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  34. Minář, J. et al. Phase-noise measurements in long-fiber interferometers for quantum-repeater applications. Phys. Rev. A 77, 052325 (2008). · DOI
  35. Nemoto, K. & Munro, W. J. Nearly deterministic linear optical controlled-not gate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 250502 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Barrett, S. D. et al. Symmetry analyzer for nondestructive Bell-state detection using weak nonlinearities. Phys. Rev. A 71, 060302 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Lin, Q. & He, B. Single-photon logic gates using minimal resources. Phys. Rev. A 80, 042310 (2009). · DOI
  38. He, B., Ren, Y. & Bergou, J. A. Creation of high-quality long-distance entanglement with flexible resources. Phys. Rev. A 79, 052323 (2009). · DOI
  39. He, B., Lin, Q. & Simon, C. Cross-Kerr nonlinearity between continuous-mode coherent states and single photons. Phys. Rev. A 83, 053826 (2011). · DOI
  40. He, B., Nadeem, M. & Bergou, J. A. Scheme for generating coherent-state superpositions with realistic cross-Kerr nonlinearity. Phys. Rev. A 79, 035802 (2009). · DOI
  41. Shapiro, J. H. Single-photon Kerr nonlinearities do not help quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 73, 062305 (2006). · DOI
  42. Shapiro, J. H. & Razavi, M. Continuous-time cross-phase modulation and quantum computation. New J. Phys. 9, 16 (2007). · DOI
  43. Gea-Banacloche, J. Impossibility of large phase shifts via the giant Kerr effect with single-photon wave packets. Phys. Rev. A 81, 043823 (2010). · DOI
  44. Kok, P., Lee, H. & Dowling, J. P. Single-photon quantum-nondemolition detectors constructed with linear optics and projective measurements. Phys. Rev. A 66, 063814 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  45. Hofmann, H. F., Kojima, K., Takeuchi, S. & Sasaki, K. Optimized phase switching using a single-atom nonlinearity. J. Opt. B 5, 218 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  46. Feizpour, A., Xing, X. & Steinberg, A. M. Amplifying single-photon nonlinearity using weak measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 133603 (2011). · DOI
  47. Zhu, C. & Huang, G. Giant kerr nonlinearity, controlled entangled photons and polarization phase gates in coupled quantum-well structures. Opt. Expre. 19, 23364–23376 (2011). · DOI
  48. Hoi, I. C. et al. Giant cross-Kerr effect for propagating microwaves induced by an artificial atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 053601 (2013). · DOI
  49. He, B. et al. Two-photon dynamics in coherent Rydberg atomic ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 133606 (2014). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sheng, Y.-B., & Zhou, L.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-01-15
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2045-2322
DOI
10.1038/srep07815
PMC
PMC4295105
Cited by
151
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review