Cited by 750Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics

Generation of Hyperentangled Photon Pairs

Open access
Barreiro, Julio T., Langford, Nathan K., Peters, Nicholas A., Kwiat, Paul G.·2005·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We experimentally demonstrate the first quantum system entangled in every degree of freedom (hyperentangled). Using pairs of photons produced in spontaneous parametric down-conversion, we verify entanglement by observing a Bell-type inequality violation in each degree of freedom: polarization, spatial mode, and time energy. We also produce and characterize maximally hyperentangled states and novel states simultaneously exhibiting both quantum and classical correlations. Finally, we report the tomography of a 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 system (36-dimensional Hilbert space), which we believe is the first reported photonic entangled system of this size to be so characterized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.95.260501

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an experiment by Barreiro et al. (2005), photon pairs from a single nonlinear crystal were entangled in polarization, energy, and orbital angular momentum.

    “In an experiment by Barreiro et al (2005), besides the entanglement in polarization and in energy, photon pairs from a single nonlinear crystal were also entangled in orbital angular momentum.”

    From Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry (2012) · cites this paper as Barreiro et al (2005)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barreiro, J. T., Langford, N. K., Peters, N. A., & Kwiat, P. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2005-12-19
Volume
95
Issue
26
Pages
260501-260501
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2014116836
Cited by
750
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 38
FWCI
32.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Keywords
hyperentanglement, spontaneous parametric down-conversion, Bell inequality violation, polarization entanglement, spatial mode entanglement, energy-time entanglement, maximally entangled states, high-dimensional entanglement, quantum state tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review