The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dental plaque development on a hydroxyapatite disk in young adults observed by using a barcoded pyrosequencing approach
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, the abundance covariations observed in both stomatotypes may partly reflect the underlying diversity of biofilm succession stages comprised in our samples and would support the main axis of previously observed core community changes in dental plaque.”
From Citizen science charts two major “stomatotypes” in the oral microbiome of adolescents and reveals links with habits and drinking water composition (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“For instance, in the case of stomatotype 1, we detected positive covariation of Fusobacterium and Capnocytophaga, both anaerobic bacteria implicated in dental plaque progression [33], while in stomatotype 2, we specifically detect antagonism between Streptococcus and Actinomyces, which are known to compete in the initial phases of dental plaque formation [32, 37].”
From Citizen science charts two major “stomatotypes” in the oral microbiome of adolescents and reveals links with habits and drinking water composition (2018) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distance
Kolenbrander, P. E., Palmer, R. J., Periasamy, S., & Jakubovics, N. S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2381 · Cited by 1,309
Chen, T., Yu, W.-H., Izard, J., Baranova, O. V., Lakshmanan, A., & Dewhirst, F. E. (2010) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baq013 · Cited by 1,162
Bacteria of Dental Caries in Primary and Permanent Teeth in Children and Young Adults
Aas, J. A., Griffen, A. L., Dardis, S. R., Lee, A. M., Olsen, I., Dewhirst, F. E., Leys, E. J., & Paster, B. J. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01410-07 · Cited by 952
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Filoche, S., Wong, L. & Sissons, C. H. Oral biofilms: emerging concepts in microbial ecology. J Dent Res 89, 8–18 (2010). · DOI
- Rickard, A. H., Gilbert, P., High, N. J., Kolenbrander, P. E. & Handley, P. S. Bacterial coaggregation: an integral process in the development of multi-species biofilms. Trends Microbiol 11, 94–100 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
- Marsh, P. D. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community - implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health 6 Suppl 1S14 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
- Ritz, H. L. Microbial population shifts in developing human dental plaque. Arch Oral Biol 12, 1561–1568 (1967). · DOI
- Kolenbrander, P. E. et al. Communication among oral bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66, 486–505 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
- Langfeldt, D. et al. Composition of microbial oral biofilms during maturation in young healthy adults. PLoS One 9, e87449 (2014). · DOI
- Kolenbrander, P. E. et al. Bacterial interactions and successions during plaque development. Periodontol 2000 42, 47–79 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
- Gross, E. L. et al. Beyond Streptococcus mutans: dental caries onset linked to multiple species by 16S rRNA community analysis. PLoS One 7, e47722 (2012). · DOI
- Tanner, A. C. et al. Cultivable anaerobic microbiota of severe early childhood caries. J Clin Microbiol 49, 1464–1474 (2011). · DOI
- Gross, E. L. et al. Bacterial 16S sequence analysis of severe caries in young permanent teeth. J Clin Microbiol 48, 4121–4128 (2010). · DOI
- Bender, R. & Lange, S. Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how? J Clin Epidemiol 54, 343–349 (2001). · DOI
- Simon-Soro, A. et al. Microbial geography of the oral cavity. J Dent Res 92, 616–621 (2013). · DOI
- Takeshita, T., Nakano, Y. & Yamashita, Y. Improved accuracy in terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism phylogenetic analysis using a novel internal size standard definition. Oral Microbiol Immunol 22, 419–428 (2007). · DOI
- Takeshita, T. et al. The ecological proportion of indigenous bacterial populations in saliva is correlated with oral health status. ISME J 3, 65–78 (2009). · DOI
- Takeshita, T. et al. Enteral tube feeding alters the oral indigenous microbiota in elderly adults. Appl Environ Microbiol 77, 6739–6745 (2011). · DOI
- Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010). · DOI
- Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7, 335–336 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
- Caporaso, J. G. et al. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics 26, 266–267 (2010). · DOI
- DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 5069–5072 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
- Haas, B. J. et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res 21, 494–504 (2011). · DOI
- Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol 26, 1641–1650 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
- Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 8228–8235 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/database/baq013 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Willis, J. R., González-Torres, P., Pittis, A. A., Bejarano, L. A., Cozzuto, L., Andreu-Somavilla, N., Alloza-Trabado, M., Valentín, A., Ksiezopolska, E., Company, C., et al. (2018) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0592-3 · Cited by 158
Jakubovics, N. S. (2015) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.022 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Takeshita, T., Yasui, M., Shibata, Y., Furuta, M., Saeki, Y., Eshima, N., & Yamashita, Y.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2015-01-30
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2045-2322
- PMC
- PMC4311255
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
