Cited by 281Data-Driven Disease SurveillanceHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisVibrio bacteria research studies

Using Mobile Phone Data to Predict the Spatial Spread of Cholera

Open access
Bengtsson, Linus, Gaudart, Jean, Lu, Xin, Moore, Sandra, Wetter, Erik, Sallah, Kankoe, Rebaudet, Stanislas, Piarroux, Renaud·2015·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Effective response to infectious disease epidemics requires focused control measures in areas predicted to be at high risk of new outbreaks. We aimed to test whether mobile operator data could predict the early spatial evolution of the 2010 Haiti cholera epidemic. Daily case data were analysed for 78 study areas from October 16 to December 16, 2010. Movements of 2.9 million anonymous mobile phone SIM cards were used to create a national mobility network. Two gravity models of population mobility were implemented for comparison. Both were optimized based on the complete retrospective epidemic data, available only after the end of the epidemic spread. Risk of an area experiencing an outbreak within seven days showed strong dose-response relationship with the mobile phone-based infectious pressure estimates. The mobile phone-based model performed better (AUC 0.79) than the retrospectively optimized gravity models (AUC 0.66 and 0.74, respectively). Infectious pressure at outbreak onset was significantly correlated with reported cholera cases during the first ten days of the epidemic (p < 0.05). Mobile operator data is a highly promising data source for improving preparedness and response efforts during cholera outbreaks. Findings may be particularly important for containment efforts of emerging infectious diseases, including high-mortality influenza strains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep08923

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Crepey P. & Barthelemy M. Detecting robust patterns in the spread of epidemics: a case study of influenza in the United States and France. Am J Epidemiol 166, 1244– 1251, 10.1093/aje/kwm266 (2007). 17938424 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bengtsson, L., Gaudart, J., Lu, X., Moore, S., Wetter, E., Sallah, K., Rebaudet, S., & Piarroux, R.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • National University of Defense Technology (CN)
  • Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
  • Stockholm School of Economics (SE)
Corresponding author
Bengtsson, Linus
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2015-03-09
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
8923-8923
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993035486
Cited by
281
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 1
FWCI
18.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71301165, 71101013)
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Vibrio bacteria research studies
Keywords
cholera, mobile phone data, human mobility, gravity model, outbreak risk prediction, epidemic preparedness and response, emerging infectious diseases
MeSH terms
Cholera, Disease Outbreaks, Haiti, Humans, Population Surveillance, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Geographic Information Systems, Cell Phone, Spatio-Temporal Analysis, Geographic Mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review