Cited by 41Insect Resistance and GeneticsInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlGenetically Modified Organisms Research

Bt crops benefit natural enemies to control non-target pests

Open access
Tian, Jun-Ce, Yao, Ju, Long, Li-Ping, Romeis, Jörg, Shelton, Anthony M.·2015·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Crops producing insecticidal crystal (Cry) proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) control important lepidopteran pests. However, pests such as aphids not susceptible to Cry proteins may require other integrated pest management (IPM) tactics, including biological control. We fed aphids on Bt and non-Bt plants and analyzed the Bt protein residue in aphids and compared the effects of Bt plants and a pyrethroid, lambda-cyhalothrin, on the performance of three natural enemies (predators: Coleomegilla maculata and Eupeodes americanus; parasitoid Aphidius colemani) of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae. No Bt protein residues in aphids were detected and no significant differences were recorded in the performance of pyrethroid-resistant aphids that fed on Bt broccoli expressing Cry1Ab or Cry1C, or on non-Bt broccoli plants treated or not treated with the pyrethroid. This indicated the aphids were not affected by the Cry proteins or the pyrethroid, thus removing any effect of prey quality. Tri-trophic experiments demonstrated that no C. maculata and E. americanus survived consumption of pyrethroid-treated aphids and that ovipositional behavior of A. colemani was impaired when provided with pyrethroid-treated aphids. In contrast, natural enemies were not affected when fed aphids reared on Bt broccoli, thus demonstrating the safety of these Bt plants for IPM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep16636

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the second comparison study, adverse effects on natural enemies were observed in the pyrethroid treatment but not in the Bt broccoli treatment.

    “Again, adverse effects on the natural enemies were observed in the pyrethroid treatment but not in the case of Bt broccoli.”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Tian et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Naranjo S. E., Ruberson J. R., Sharma H. C., Wilson L. & Wu K. In Integration of insect-resistant genetically modified crops within IPM programs (eds Romeis J., Shelton A. M., & Kennedy G. G.) 159– 194 (Springer, 2008).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tian, J.-C., Yao, J., Long, L.-P., Romeis, J., & Shelton, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Agroscope (CH)
Corresponding author
Shelton, Anthony M.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2015-11-12
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
16636-16636
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2402764482
Cited by
41
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Keywords
Bt crops, Bacillus thuringiensis, Cry proteins, non-target effects, natural enemies, biological control, Myzus persicae, lambda-cyhalothrin, pyrethroid resistance, Coleomegilla maculata, Aphidius colemani, prey quality, oviposition behavior, integrated pest management, broccoli, Cry1Ab, Cry1C
MeSH terms
Animals, Aphids, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacterial Proteins, Host-Parasite Interactions, Pest Control, Biological, Receptors, Cell Surface, Crops, Agricultural, Insect Proteins, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review