Cited by 252Insect Resistance and GeneticsGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

Impacts of Bt crops on non-target invertebrates and insecticide use patterns.

Naranjo, S. E.·2009·CABI Reviews

Abstract

The ubiquitous nature of Bacillus thuringiensis ( Bt ), a Gram-positive bacterium capable of producing crystal proteins with insecticidal activity during sporulation, is now being mirrored in major crops plants that have been engineered through recombinant DNA to carry genes responsible for producing these crystal proteins and providing host plant resistance to major lepidopteran and coleopteran pests. In 2007, the 11th year of commercial production, Bt maize and Bt cotton were commercially produced on a total of ∼42 million hectares in 20 countries. Assessment of environmental safety has been and continues to be a key element of transgenic crop technology. This review focuses on two environmental elements, effects on non-target invertebrates and changes in insecticide use patterns since the adoption of Bt maize and cotton. Meta-analyses of the extant literature on invertebrate non-target effects reveals that the pattern and extent of impact varies in relation to taxonomy, ecological or anthropomorphic guild, route of exposure and the non- Bt control against which effects are gauged. Hazards identified in the laboratory may not always manifest in the field and the minor negative effects of Bt crops demonstrated in the field pale in comparison with alternative pest suppression measures based on insecticides. The efficacy of Bt maize and cotton against major pest species has been associated with an estimated 136.6 million kg global reduction in insecticide active ingredient used between 1996 and 2006 (29.9% reduction). Benefits vary by country and region and are heavily weighted towards cotton production, which has historically been one of the largest users of insecticides in the world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/pavsnnr20094011

Cites

237 of 237 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 239 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naranjo, S. E.
Corresponding author
Naranjo, S. E.
Venue
CABI Reviews
Published
2009-06-10
Pages
1-11
ISSN
1749-8848 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171756104
Cited by
252
References
239
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 30
FWCI
10.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CABI Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
Bt crops, Bacillus thuringiensis, non-target invertebrates, insecticide reduction, Bt maize, Bt cotton, genetically modified crops, environmental safety, insecticidal proteins, pest suppression, non-target effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review