The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integration of single cell injection, cell lysis, separation and detection of intracellular constituents on a microfluidic chipElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Video showing a single erythrocyte transported through the microchannel, docking (adhering) at a particular point and then being lysed. See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/lc/b3/b310552k/
Abstract
A microfluidic system was developed for the analysis of single biological cells, with functional integration of cell sampling, single cell loading, docking, lysing, and capillary electrophoretic (CE) separation with laser induced fluorescence (LIF) detection in microfabricated channels of a single glass chip. Channels were 12 microm deep and 48 microm wide, with a simple crossed-channel design. The effective separation channel length was 35 mm. During sampling with a cell suspension (cell population 1.2 x 10(5) cells per mL in physiological salt solution), differential hydrostatic pressure (created by adjusting liquid levels in the four reservoirs) was used to control cell flow exclusively through the channel crossing. Single cell loading into the separation channel was achieved by electrophoretic means by applying a set of potentials at the four reservoirs, counteracting the hydrostatic flow. A special docking (adhering) procedure for the loaded cell was applied before lysis by repeatedly connecting and disconnecting a set of low potentials, allowing precise positioning of the cell within the separation channel. Cell lysis was then effected within 40 ms under an applied CE separation voltage of 1.4 kV (280 V cm(-1)) within the working electrolyte (pH 9.2 borate buffer) without additional lysates. The docked lysing approach reduced dispersion of released intracellular constituents, and significantly improved the reproducibility of CE separations. Glutathione (GSH) was used as a model intracellular component in single human erythrocyte cells. NDA derivatized GSH was detected using LIF. A throughput of 15 samples h(-1), a retention time precision of 2.4% RSD was obtained for 14 consecutively injected cells. The average cellular concentration of GSH in human erythrocytes was found to be 7.2 [times] 10(-4)+/- 3.3 x 10(-4) M (63 +/- 29 amol per cell). The average separation efficiency for GSH in lysed cells was 2.13 x 10(6)+/- 0.4 x 10(6) plates per m, and was about a factor of 5 higher than those obtained with GSH standards using pinched injection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glutathione metabolism and its selective modification.
Meister, A. (1988) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)77815-6 · Cited by 2,011
Jacobson, S. C., Hergenroder, R., Koutny, L. B., Warmack, R. J., & Ramsey, J. M. (1994) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00079a028 · Cited by 669
Microfluidic Device for Single-Cell Analysis
Wheeler, A. R., Throndset, W. R., Whelan, R. J., Leach, A. M., Zare, R. N., Liao, Y. H., Farrell, K., Manger, I. D., & Daridon, A. (2003) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0340758 · Cited by 600
Transport, Manipulation, and Reaction of Biological Cells On-Chip Using Electrokinetic Effects
Li, P. C. H., & Harrison, D. J. (1997) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac9606564 · Cited by 422
Schilling, E. A., Kamholz, A. E., & Yager, P. (2002) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac015640e · Cited by 299
A 3-D microelectrode system for handling and caging single cells and particles
Müller, T., Gradl, G., Howitz, S., Shirley, S., Schnelle, T., & Fuhr, G. (1999) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/s0956-5663(99)00006-8 · Cited by 242
Yang, M., Li, C.-W., & Yang, J. (2002) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac025536c · Cited by 182
Arai, F., Ichikawa, A., Ogawa, M., Fukuda, T., Horio, K., & Itoigawa, K. (2001) · Electrophoresis · Cited by 148
Powerful tools for genetic analysis come of age
Graves, D. J. (1999) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0167-7799(98)01241-4 · Cited by 140
Orwar, O., Fishman, H. A., Ziv, N. E., Scheller, R. H., & Zare, R. N. (1995) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00119a010 · Cited by 130
Instrumentation for Chemical Cytometry
Krylov, S. N., Starke, D. A., Arriaga, E. A., Zhang, Z., Chan, N. W. C., Palcic, M. M., & Dovic̀hi, N. J. (2000) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac991096m · Cited by 117
Kennedy, R. T., & Jorgenson, J. W. (1989) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00180a012 · Cited by 113
Improved procedure for determining glutathione in plasma as an index of myocardial oxidative stress.
Curello, S., Ceconi, C., Cargnoni, A., et al. (1987) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/33.8.1448 · Cited by 96
Cited by
El-Ali, J., Sorger, P. K., & Jensen, K. F. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05063 · Cited by 2,102
Toner, M., & Irimia, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.011205.135108 · Cited by 623
Microfluidic Devices for Bioapplications
Yeo, L. Y., Chang, H., Chan, P. P. Y., & Friend, J. R. (2011) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201000946 · Cited by 622
Microfluidics technology for manipulation and analysis of biological cells
Yi, C., Li, C.-W., Ji, S., & Yang, M. (2006) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2005.12.037 · Cited by 478
Thompson, B. L., Ouyang, Y., Duarte, G. R. M., Carrilho, E., Krauss, S. T., & Landers, J. P. (2015) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2015.051 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, J., Yin, X.-F., & Fang, Z.-L.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W2151704374
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 17.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.