Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A microfluidic device for a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) model on a chip

Sung, Jong Hwan, Kam, Carrie, Shuler, Michael L.·2010·Lab on a Chip

Abstract

Drug discovery is often impeded by the poor predictability of in vitro assays for drug toxicity. One primary reason for this observation is the inability to reproduce the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs in vitro. Mathematical models to predict the pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) of drugs are available, but have several limitations, preventing broader application. A microscale cell culture analog (microCCA) is a microfluidic device based on a PK-PD model, where multiple cell culture chambers are connected with fluidic channels to mimic multi-organ interactions and test drug toxicity in a pharmacokinetic-based manner. One critical issue with microfluidics, including the microCCA, is that specialized techniques are required for assembly and operation, limiting its usability to non-experts. Here, we describe a novel design, with enhanced usability while allowing hydrogel-cell cultures of multiple types. Gravity-induced flow enables pumpless operation and prevents bubble formation. Three cell lines representing the liver, tumor and marrow were cultured in the three-chamber microCCA to test the toxicity of an anticancer drug, 5-fluorouracil. The result was analyzed with a PK-PD model of the device, and compared with the result in static conditions. Each cell type exhibited differential responses to 5-FU, and the responses in the microfluidic environment were different from those in static environment. Combination of a mathematical modeling approach (PK-PD modeling) and an in vitro experimental approach (microCCA) provides a novel platform with improved predictability for testing drug toxicity and can help researchers gain a better insight into the drug's mechanism of action.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b917763a

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 484

Metadata

Authors
Sung, J. H., Kam, C., & Shuler, M. L.
Venue
Lab on a Chip
Published
2010
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
446
ISSN
  • 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0197
OpenAlex
W2112791462
Cited by
484
References
42
FWCI
16.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A microfluidic device for a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) model on a chip. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b917763a
The paper
Sung, J. H., Kam, C., & Shuler, M. L. (2010). A microfluidic device for a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) model on a chip. Lab on a Chip. https://doi.org/10.1039/b917763a

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.