The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A microfluidic device for a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) model on a chip
Abstract
Drug discovery is often impeded by the poor predictability of in vitro assays for drug toxicity. One primary reason for this observation is the inability to reproduce the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs in vitro. Mathematical models to predict the pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) of drugs are available, but have several limitations, preventing broader application. A microscale cell culture analog (microCCA) is a microfluidic device based on a PK-PD model, where multiple cell culture chambers are connected with fluidic channels to mimic multi-organ interactions and test drug toxicity in a pharmacokinetic-based manner. One critical issue with microfluidics, including the microCCA, is that specialized techniques are required for assembly and operation, limiting its usability to non-experts. Here, we describe a novel design, with enhanced usability while allowing hydrogel-cell cultures of multiple types. Gravity-induced flow enables pumpless operation and prevents bubble formation. Three cell lines representing the liver, tumor and marrow were cultured in the three-chamber microCCA to test the toxicity of an anticancer drug, 5-fluorouracil. The result was analyzed with a PK-PD model of the device, and compared with the result in static conditions. Each cell type exhibited differential responses to 5-FU, and the responses in the microfluidic environment were different from those in static environment. Combination of a mathematical modeling approach (PK-PD modeling) and an in vitro experimental approach (microCCA) provides a novel platform with improved predictability for testing drug toxicity and can help researchers gain a better insight into the drug's mechanism of action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?
Kola, I., & Landis, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1470 · Cited by 4,167
Monolithic Microfabricated Valves and Pumps by Multilayer Soft Lithography
Unger, M. A., Chou, H.-P., Thorsen, T., Scherer, A., & Quake, S. R. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5463.113 · Cited by 4,010
Physiological Parameters in Laboratory Animals and Humans
Davies, B., & Morris, T. (1993) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1018943613122 · Cited by 2,926
Wilkening, S., Stahl, F., & Bader, A. (2003) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.31.8.1035 · Cited by 794
Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile.
Heggie, G. D., Sommadossi, J., Cross, D. S., Huster, W. J., & Diasio, R. B. (1987) · PubMed · Cited by 722
Role of Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism in Drug Discovery and Development
Lin, J. H., & Lu, A. Y. H. (1997) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01340-1 · Cited by 708
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling: Principles and Applications
Gerlowski, L. E., & Jain, R. K. (1983) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.2600721003 · Cited by 576
An update on in vitro test methods in human hepatic drug biotransformation research: pros and cons
Brandon, E. F. A., Raap, C. D., Meijerman, I., Beijnen, J. H., & Schellens, J. H. M. (2003) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0041-008x(03)00128-5 · Cited by 567
Key factors in the rising cost of new drug discovery and development
Dickson, M., & Gagnon, J. P. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1382 · Cited by 498
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and the efficacy and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil
van Kuilenburg, A. B. P. (2004) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2003.12.004 · Cited by 488
Cited by
Bhatia, S. N., & Ingber, D. E. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2989 · Cited by 3,305
From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips
Huh, D., Hamilton, G. A., & Ingber, D. E. (2011) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.005 · Cited by 1,834
Kim, H. J., Huh, D., Hamilton, G., & Ingber, D. E. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc40074j · Cited by 1,734
25th Anniversary Article: Rational Design and Applications of Hydrogels in Regenerative Medicine
Annabi, N., Tamayol, A., Uquillas, J. A., Akbari, M., Bertassoni, L. E., Cha, C., Camci‐Unal, G., Dokmeci, M. R., Peppas, N. A., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201303233 · Cited by 1,409
Organs-on-chips at the frontiers of drug discovery
Esch, E. W., Bahinski, A., & Huh, D. (2015) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4539 · Cited by 1,185
Metadata
- Authors
- Sung, J. H., Kam, C., & Shuler, M. L.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 446
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W2112791462
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 16.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A microfluidic device for a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) model on a chip. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b917763a
- The paper
- Sung, J. H., Kam, C., & Shuler, M. L. (2010). A microfluidic device for a pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) model on a chip. Lab on a Chip. https://doi.org/10.1039/b917763a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.