Cited by 25Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistrySynthesis and pharmacology of benzodiazepine derivatives

Rapid characterization of cross-links, mono-adducts, and non-covalent binding of psoralens to deoxyoligonucleotides by LC-UV/ESI-MS and IRMPD mass spectrometry

Open access
Smith, Suncerae I., Brodbelt, Jennifer S.·2010·The Analyst

Abstract

Upon UV photoactivation, psoralen analogs form covalent mono-adducts and cross-links with DNA at thymine residues. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometric analysis allowed rapid and efficient determination of the reaction percentages of each psoralen analog with DNA duplexes containing different binding sites after exposure to UV irradiation. The distribution of cross-linked products and mono-adducts was monitored by both LC-UV and IRMPD-MS methods with the highest ratio of cross-linked products to mono-adducts obtained for 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP), psoralen (P), and 5-methoxypsoralen (5-MOP). Reactions at 5'-TA sites were favored over 5'-AT sites, and duplexes containing two and three binding sites showed extensive binding by the psoralens. 4'-Aminomethyl-4,5',8-trimethylpsoralen (AMP) bound non-selectively via non-covalent interactions and was the only psoralen analog to show significant binding in the absence of UV irradiation. 8-MOP binding displayed the greatest sequence selectivity among the psoralen analogs. The sites of interstrand cross-linking were determined by fragmentation of the duplex/psoralen complexes by infrared multiphoton dissociation (IRMPD), which produced cross-linked product ions containing an intact single strand, the psoralen analog, and either a w(n) or a(n)-B portion of the complementary strand. IRMPD of DNA/AMP complexes after UV irradiation also produced high abundances of the intact single strands with the AMP ligand attached, products indicative of a significant population of mono-adducts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b924023c

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A complementary analytical tool involving liquid chromatography with UV/ESI-MS or IR multiphoton dissociation mass spectrometry is available for monitoring distribution of psoralen mono- and bi-adducts to pyrimidine bases in duplex oligodeoxynucleotides.

    “A complementary analytical tool for monitoring the distribution of psoralen mono-and bi-adducts to pyrimidine bases in duplex oligodeoxynucleotides that involves the association of liquid chromatography with either UV ⁄ ESI-MS or IR multiphoton dissociation mass spectrometry has recently become available (173).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [1]Waring MJ Drugs under Experimental and Clinical Research 1986 12 441 2427296
  2. [2]Avendano C 2008 Elsevier Amsterdam; Boston 1st ed
  3. [5]Chun Edward H. L. Gonzales Leon Lewis Florence S. Jones Judith Rutman Robert J. Cancer Research 1969 29 1184 5797106
  4. [10]Straub K Kanne D Hearst JE Rapoport H Journal of the American Chemical Society 1981 103 2347
  5. [12]Kanne D Straub K Hearst JE Rapoport H Journal of the American Chemical Society 1982b 104 6754
  6. [30]Gale DC Goodlett DR Light-Wahl KJ Smith RD Journal of the American Chemical Society 1994 116 6027
  7. [31]Gale DC Smith RD Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 1995 6 1154 24214066
  8. [47]Rosu F Pirotte S Pauw E Gabelica V International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 2006 253 156
  9. [55]Colgrave ML Iannitti-Tito P Wickham G Sheil MM Australian Journal of Chemistry 2003 56 401

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, S. I., & Brodbelt, J. S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Brodbelt, Jennifer S.
Venue
The Analyst
Published
2010
Volume
135
Issue
5
Pages
943
ISSN
  • 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5528
OpenAlex
W1967245942
Cited by
25
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Analyst (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM65956, R01GM065956)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and pharmacology of benzodiazepine derivatives
Keywords
psoralen, DNA cross-linking, monoadducts, UV photoactivation, 8-methoxypsoralen, 5-methoxypsoralen, non-covalent DNA binding, sequence selectivity, interstrand cross-links, double-stranded DNA
MeSH terms
5-Methoxypsoralen, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Methoxsalen, Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Furocoumarins, Thymine, Ultraviolet Rays, DNA Adducts, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review