The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microneedle array-based carbon paste amperometric sensors and biosensors
Abstract
The design and characterization of a microneedle array-based carbon paste electrode towards minimally invasive electrochemical sensing are described. Arrays consisting of 3 × 3 pyramidal microneedle structures, each with an opening of 425 µm, were loaded with a metallized carbon paste transducer. The renewable nature of carbon paste electrodes enables the convenient packing of hollow non-planar microneedles with pastes that contain assorted catalysts and biocatalysts. Smoothing the surface results in good microelectrode-to-microelectrode uniformity. Optical and scanning electron micrographs shed useful insights into the surface morphology at the microneedle apertures. The attractive performance of the novel microneedle electrode arrays is illustrated in vitro for the low-potential detection of hydrogen peroxide at rhodium-dispersed carbon paste microneedles and for lactate biosensing by the inclusion of lactate oxidase in the metallized carbon paste matrix. Highly repeatable sensing is observed following consecutive cycles of packing/unpacking the carbon paste. The operational stability of the array is demonstrated as well as the interference-free detection of lactate in the presence of physiologically relevant levels of ascorbic acid, uric acid, and acetaminophen. Upon addressing the biofouling effects associated with on-body sensing, the microneedle carbon paste platform would be attractive for the subcutaneous electrochemical monitoring of a number of physiologically relevant analytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrochemical Glucose Biosensors
Wang, J. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068123a · Cited by 3,498
Self-citationEnzyme-Based Biosensors for in Vivo Measurements
Wilson, G. S., & Hu, Y. (2000) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr990003y · Cited by 434
Cited by
Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery
Kim, Y.-C., Park, J.-H., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005 · Cited by 1,760
Wearable Electrochemical Glucose Sensors in Diabetes Management: A Comprehensive Review
Saha, T., Del Caño, R., Mahato, K., De la Paz, E., Chen, C., Ding, S., Yin, L., & Wang, J. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00078 · Cited by 442
Self-citationLab under the Skin: Microneedle Based Wearable Devices
Teymourian, H., Tehrani, F., Mahato, K., & Wang, J. (2021) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202002255 · Cited by 310
Self-citationWearable and Mobile Sensors for Personalized Nutrition
Sempionatto, J. R., Montiel, V. R.-V., Vargas, E., Teymourian, H., & Wang, J. (2021) · ACS Sensors · doi:10.1021/acssensors.1c00553 · Cited by 237
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Windmiller, J. R., Zhou, N., Chuang, M.-C., Valdés-Ramírez, G., Santhosh, P., Miller, P. R., Narayan, R., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- The Analyst
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1846
- ISSN
- 0003-2654 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5528
- OpenAlex
- W2159218869
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microneedle array-based carbon paste amperometric sensors and biosensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1an00012h
- The paper
- Windmiller, J. R., Zhou, N., Chuang, M.-C., Valdés-Ramírez, G., Santhosh, P., Miller, P. R., Narayan, R., & Wang, J. (2011). Microneedle array-based carbon paste amperometric sensors and biosensors. The Analyst. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1an00012h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.