Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 488

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The role of the Auger parameter in XPS studies of nickel metal, halides and oxides

Biesinger, Mark C., Lau, Leo W. M., Gerson, Andrea R., Smart, Roger St. C.·2012·Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Abstract

The critical role of the Auger parameter in providing insight into both initial state and final state factors affecting measured XPS binding energies is illustrated by analysis of Ni 2p(3/2) and L(3)M(45)M(45) peaks as well as the Auger parameters of nickel alloys, halides, oxide, hydroxide and oxy-hydroxide. Analyses of the metal and alloys are consistent with other works, showing that final state relaxation shifts, ΔR, are determined predominantly by changes in the d electron population and are insensitive to inter-atomic charge transfer. The nickel halide Auger parameters are dominated by initial state effects, Δε, with increasing positive charge on the core nickel ion induced by increasing electronegativity of the ligands. This effect is much greater than the final state shifts; however, the degree of covalency is reflected in the Wagner plot where the more polarizable iodide and bromide have greater ΔR. The initial state shift for NiO is much smaller than those of Ni(OH)(2) or NiOOH and the effective oxidation state is much less than that inferred from the average electronegativity of the ligand(s). Auger parameter analysis indicates that the bonding in NiO appears to have stronger contributions from initial state charge transfer from the oxygen ligands than that in the hydroxide and oxyhydroxide consistent with the considerable differences in the Ni-O bond lengths in these compounds with some relaxation of this state occurring during final state phenomena. The Auger parameter of NiOOH is, however, shifted positively, like the iodide, indicating greater polarizability of the ligands and covalency in this bonding. There is support for more direct use of relative bond lengths in interpreting differences between related compounds rather than more general electronegativity or similar parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2cp22419d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Biesinger, 2011, Appl. Surf. Sci., 257, 2717, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Biesinger, 2004, Surf. Interface Anal., 36, 1550, 10.1002/sia.1983 · DOI
  3. Nesbitt, 1998, Am. Mineral., 83, 305, 10.2138/am-1998-3-414 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Banerjee, 1999, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 63, 3025, 10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00230-6 · DOI
  5. Banerjee, 1999, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 63, 1671, 10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00003-4 · DOI
  6. Banerjee, 2001, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 65, 1703, 10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00562-2 · DOI
  7. Grosvenor, 2006, Surf. Sci., 600, 1771, 10.1016/j.susc.2006.01.041 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Biesinger, 2008, Surf. Interface Anal., 41, 324, 10.1002/sia.3026 · DOI · Paper page
  9. McIntyre, 1977, Anal. Chem., 49, 1521, 10.1021/ac50019a016 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Grosvenor, 2004, Surf. Interface Anal., 36, 1564, 10.1002/sia.1984 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Zaanen, 1985, Phys. Rev. Lett., 55, 418, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.418 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hagelin-Weaver, 2004, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 134, 139, 10.1016/j.elspec.2003.10.002 · DOI
  13. Hagelin-Weaver, 2005, J. Alloys Compd., 389, 34, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.07.039 · DOI
  14. Wagner, 1972, Anal. Chem., 44, 967, 10.1021/ac60314a015 · doi:10.1021/ac60314a015
  15. Moretti, 1998, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 95, 95, 10.1016/S0368-2048(98)00249-7 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Wagner, 1979, Anal. Chem., 51, 466, 10.1021/ac50040a005 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Wagner, 1982, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 28, 211, 10.1016/0368-2048(82)85044-5 · doi:10.1016/0368-2048(82)85044-5
  18. Pan, 2010, Appl. Surf. Sci., 256, 4850, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.01.115 · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.01.115
  19. Tao, 2008, Surf. Sci., 602, 2769, 10.1016/j.susc.2008.06.034 · doi:10.1016/j.susc.2008.06.034
  20. Sanz, 1996, Surf. Sci., 367, 196, 10.1016/S0039-6028(96)00818-7 · doi:10.1016/s0039-6028(96)00818-7
  21. Allen, 1977, Surf. Sci., 68, 469, 10.1016/0039-6028(77)90240-0 · doi:10.1016/0039-6028(77)90240-0
  22. Andrews, 1981, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys., 14, L957, 10.1088/0022-3719/14/31/006 · DOI
  23. Roberts, 1975, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys., 8, L301, 10.1088/0022-3719/8/13/006 · doi:10.1088/0022-3719/8/13/006
  24. Cole, 2003, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 133, 47, 10.1016/j.elspec.2003.08.004 · doi:10.1016/j.elspec.2003.08.004
  25. Mårtensson, 1984, Phys. Scr., 29, 154, 10.1088/0031-8949/29/2/012 · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/29/2/012
  26. Cole, 1995, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 15, 2976, 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.2976 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.52.2976
  27. Richter, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 026805, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.026805 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Bagus, 2006, Chem. Phys. Lett., 420, 42, 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.12.033 · doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2005.12.033
  29. Miller, 2002, Surf. Interface Anal., 33, 299, 10.1002/sia.1188 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Van der Heide, 2008, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 164, 8, 10.1016/j.elspec.2008.04.001 · DOI
  31. Roberts, 1984, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 80, 2957, 10.1039/f19848002957 · DOI
  32. McIntyre, 1978, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2, 55, 10.1016/0378-5963(78)90006-5 · DOI
  33. van der Laan, 1988, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 37, 6587, 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.6587 · DOI
  34. Ronda, 1987, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 35, 4038, 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.4038 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.35.4038
  35. Barrière, 1982, Thin Solid Films, 89, 77, 10.1016/0040-6090(82)90482-5 · doi:10.1016/0040-6090(82)90482-5
  36. van der Laan, 1985, Solid State Commun., 56, 673, 10.1016/0038-1098(85)90776-8 · doi:10.1016/0038-1098(85)90776-8
  37. Allred, 1961, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 17, 215, 10.1016/0022-1902(61)80142-5 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Brik, 2007, Phys. B (Amsterdam, Neth.), 387, 69, 10.1016/j.physb.2006.03.092 · doi:10.1016/j.physb.2006.03.092
  39. Taylor, 1974, Acta Crystallogr., B30, 554, 10.1107/S0567740874003268 · doi:10.1107/s0567740874003268
  40. Brika, 2006, Physica B (Amsterdam), 371, 43, 10.1016/j.physb.2005.09.034 · DOI
  41. Eriksson, 2002, J. Power Sources, 107, 34, 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00984-3 · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(01)00984-3
  42. Demourgues, 1977, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 133, 39, 10.1016/S0168-583X(97)00459-X · doi:10.1016/s0168-583x(97)00459-x
  43. Oliva, 1982, J. Power Sources, 8, 229, 10.1016/0378-7753(82)80057-8 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Carley, 1999, Surf. Sci., 440, L868, 10.1016/S0039-6028(99)00872-9 · DOI
  45. Bredow, 2000, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 61, 5194, 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.5194 · DOI · Paper page
  46. van Veenendaal, 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 2459, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2459 · DOI
  47. Bagus, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 2259, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2259 · DOI
  48. Gupta, 1974, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 10, 71, 10.1103/PhysRevB.10.71 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Gupta, 1975, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 12, 15, 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.15 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 488

Metadata

Authors
Biesinger, M. C., Lau, L. W. M., Gerson, A. R., & Smart, R. S. C.
Venue
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Published
2012
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
2434
ISSN
  • 1463-9076 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-9084
OpenAlex
W2158722234
Cited by
488
References
0
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of the Auger parameter in XPS studies of nickel metal, halides and oxides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2cp22419d
The paper
Biesinger, M. C., Lau, L. W. M., Gerson, A. R., & Smart, R. S. C. (2012). The role of the Auger parameter in XPS studies of nickel metal, halides and oxides. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp22419d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.