The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanotoxicity assessment of quantum dots: from cellular to primate studies
Abstract
Tremendous research efforts have been devoted to fabricating high quality quantum dots (QDs) for applications in biology and medicine. Much of this research was pursued with an ultimate goal of using QDs in clinical applications. However, a great deal of concern has been voiced about the potential hazards of QDs due to their heavy-metal content. Many studies have demonstrated toxicity of various QDs in cell culture studies. However, in a smaller number of studies using small animal models (mice and rats), no abnormal behaviour or tissue damage was noticed over periods of months after the systemic administration of QDs. Nevertheless, the correlation of these results with the potential for negative effects of QD on humans remains unclear. Many urgent questions must be answered before the QDs community moves into the clinical research phase. This review provides an overview of the toxicity assessment of QDs, ranging from cell culture studies to animal models and discusses their findings. Guidelines for using various nonhuman primate models for QD toxicity studies are highlighted. This review article is intended to promote the awareness of current developments of QD applications in biology, the potential toxicity of QDs, and approaches to minimizing toxicity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lane, D. P. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/358015a0 · Cited by 5,138
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome.
Gibbs, R. A., Rogers, J., Katze, M. G., Bumgarner, R., Weinstock, G. M., Mardis, E. R., Remington, K. A., Strausberg, R. L., Venter, J. C., Wilson, R. K., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1139247 · Cited by 1,403
Neurotoxicity of Silica Nanoparticles: Brain Localization and Dopaminergic Neurons Damage Pathways
Wu, J., Wang, C., Sun, J., & Xue, Y. (2011) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn103530b · Cited by 286
Cited by
Antibacterial Activity of Ti3C2Tx MXene
Rasool, K., Helal, M., Ali, A., Ren, C. E., Gogotsi, Y., & Mahmoud, K. A. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b00181 · Cited by 1,449
New Generation Cadmium-Free Quantum Dots for Biophotonics and Nanomedicine
Xu, G., Zeng, S., Zhang, B., Swihart, M. T., Yong, K.-T., & Prasad, P. N. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00290 · Cited by 587
Self-citationNanocarbons for Biology and Medicine: Sensing, Imaging, and Drug Delivery
Panwar, N., Soehartono, A. M., Chan, K. K., Zeng, S., Xu, G., Qu, J., Coquet, P., Yong, K.-T., & Chen, X. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00099 · Cited by 555
Self-citationMeta-analysis of cellular toxicity for cadmium-containing quantum dots
Oh, E., Liu, R., Nel, A., Gemill, K. B., Bilal, M., Cohen, Y., & Medintz, I. L. (2016) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.338 · Cited by 502
Application of semiconductor quantum dots in bioimaging and biosensing
Martynenko, I. V., Litvin, A. P., Purcell-Milton, F., Baranov, A. V., Fedorov, A. V., & Gun'ko, Y. K. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/c7tb01425b · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Yong, K.-T., Law, W.-C., Hu, R., Ye, L., Liu, L., Swihart, M. T., & Prasad, P. N.
- Venue
- Chem. Soc. Rev.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1236-1250
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2116448420
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanotoxicity assessment of quantum dots: from cellular to primate studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c2cs35392j
- The paper
- Yong, K.-T., Law, W.-C., Hu, R., Ye, L., Liu, L., Swihart, M. T., & Prasad, P. N. (2013). Nanotoxicity assessment of quantum dots: from cellular to primate studies. Chem. Soc. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35392j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.