The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident
Abstract
This study quantifies worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident on 11 March 2011. Effects are quantified with a 3-D global atmospheric model driven by emission estimates and evaluated against daily worldwide Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) measurements and observed deposition rates. Inhalation exposure, ground-level external exposure, and atmospheric external exposure pathways of radioactive iodine-131, cesium-137, and cesium-134 released from Fukushima are accounted for using a linear no-threshold (LNT) model of human exposure. Exposure due to ingestion of contaminated food and water is estimated by extrapolation. We estimate an additional 130 (15–1100) cancer-related mortalities and 180 (24–1800) cancer-related morbidities incorporating uncertainties associated with the exposure–dose and dose–response models used in the study. We also discuss the LNT model's uncertainty at low doses. Sensitivities to emission rates, gas to particulate I-131 partitioning, and the mandatory evacuation radius around the plant are also explored, and may increase upper bound mortalities and morbidities in the ranges above to 1300 and 2500, respectively. Radiation exposure to workers at the plant is projected to result in 2 to 12 morbidities. An additional ∼600 mortalities have been reported due to non-radiological causes such as mandatory evacuations. Lastly, a hypothetical accident at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant in California, USA with identical emissions to Fukushima was studied to analyze the influence of location and seasonality on the impact of a nuclear accident. This hypothetical accident may cause ∼25% more mortalities than Fukushima despite California having one fourth the local population density due to differing meteorological conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation:: BEIR VII Phase 2
Earth, D. O. (2006) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,190
Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling
Jacobson, M. Z. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165389 · Cited by 1,334
Self-citationCHINO, M., NAKAYAMA, H., NAGAI, H., TERADA, H., KATATA, G., & YAMAZAWA, H. (2011) · Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/18811248.2011.9711799 · Cited by 962
Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2
(2006) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/11340 · Cited by 904
Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident
Yasunari, T. J., Stohl, A., Hayano, R. S., Burkhart, J. F., Eckhardt, S., & Yasunari, T. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1112058108 · Cited by 657
The Linear No-Threshold Relationship Is Inconsistent with Radiation Biologic and Experimental Data
Tubiana, M., Feinendegen, L. E., Yang, C., & Kaminski, J. M. (2009) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2511080671 · Cited by 509
Morino, Y., Ohara, T., & Nishizawa, M. (2011) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2011gl048689 · Cited by 390
Molecular hydrogen in the troposphere: Global distribution and budget
Novelli, P. C., Lang, P. M., Masarie, K. A., Hurst, D. F., Myers, R., & Elkins, J. W. (1999) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1999jd900788 · Cited by 389
Jacobson, M. Z. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2009jd013795 · Cited by 337
Self-citationContents, preface, executive summary, chapters 1 and 2
Valentin, J. (2005) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2005.11.002 · Cited by 269
A 25 Year Retrospective Review of the Psychological Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident
Bromet, E. J., Havenaar, J. M., & Guey, L. T. (2011) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2011.01.501 · Cited by 269
The Global Impact of the Chernobyl Reactor Accident
Anspaugh, L. R., Catlin, R. J., & Goldman, M. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3201240 · Cited by 252
Cancer consequences of the Chernobyl accident: 20 years on
Cardis, E., Howe, G., Ron, E., Bebeshko, V., Bogdanova, T., Bouville, A., Carr, Z., Chumak, V., Davis, S., Demidchik, Y., et al. (2006) · Journal of Radiological Protection · doi:10.1088/0952-4746/26/2/001 · Cited by 244
Jacobson, M. Z. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2001jd002044 · Cited by 227
Self-citationBaes, C. F. I., Sharp, R. D., Sjoreen, A. L., & Shor, R. W. (1984) · doi:10.2172/6355677 · Cited by 224
Walcek, C. J. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1999jd901142 · Cited by 206
Jacobson, M. Z. (2001) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2000jd900560 · Cited by 182
Self-citationHormesis: from marginalization to mainstream
Calabrese, E. J. (2004) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2004.02.007 · Cited by 163
Estimates of the cancer burden in Europe from radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl accident
Cardis, E., Krewski, D. R., Boniol, M., Drozdovitch, V., Darby, S. C., Gilbert, E. S., Akiba, S., Bénichou, J., Ferlay, J., Gandini, S., et al. (2006) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.22037 · Cited by 155
The overwhelming role of soils in the global atmospheric hydrogen cycle
Rhee, T. S., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., & Röckmann, T. (2006) · Atmospheric chemistry and physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-1611-2006 · Cited by 154
Mental health consequences of the Chernobyl disaster
Bromet, E. J. (2012) · Journal of Radiological Protection · doi:10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/n71 · Cited by 152
Winiarek, V., Bocquet, M., Saunier, O., & Mathieu, A. (2012) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2011jd016932 · Cited by 150
Enhancement of Local Air Pollution by Urban CO2Domes
Jacobson, M. Z. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es903018m · Cited by 115
Self-citationCancer Risk of Low-Level Exposure
Goldman, M. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5257.1821 · Cited by 113
The radiological and psychological consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi accident
Hippel, F. N. V. (2011) · Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists · doi:10.1177/0096340211421588 · Cited by 95
Improving the scientific foundations for estimating health risks from the Fukushima incident
Calabrese, E. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1117296108 · Cited by 48
Fukushima reaches cold shutdown
Brumfiel, G. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature.2011.9674 · Cited by 9
Indoor exposure to radiation in the case of an outdoorrelease
Price, P. N., USDOE, & Jayaraman, B. (2006) · doi:10.2172/892947 · Cited by 3
Cited by
Electrochromics for smart windows: Oxide-based thin films and devices
Granqvist, C. G. (2014) · Thin Solid Films · doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.002 · Cited by 1,080
Iodine capture in porous organic polymers and metal–organic frameworks materials
Xie, W., Cui, D., Zhang, S.-R., Xu, Y.-H., & Jiang, D.-L. (2019) · Materials Horizons · doi:10.1039/c8mh01656a · Cited by 622
Removal of cesium ions from aqueous solutions using various separation technologies
Wang, J., & Zhuang, S. (2019) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-019-09499-9 · Cited by 328
Optimized Phytoremediation Process for the Sustainable Management of Radionuclides
(2023) · Journal of Food Chemistry & Nanotechnology · doi:10.17756/jfcn.2023-s1-038 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Ten Hoeve, J. E., & Jacobson, M. Z.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 8743
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2066466241
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 19.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
