Cited by 31Photodynamic Therapy Research StudiesNonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesPorphyrin Metabolism and Disorders

Light fractionated ALA-PDT enhances therapeutic efficacy in vitro; the influence of PpIX concentration and illumination parameters

Open access
de Bruijn, Henriëtte S., Casas, Adriana G., Di Venosa, Gabriela, Gandara, Lautato, Sterenborg, Henricus J. C. M., Batlle, Alcira, Robinson, Dominic J.·2013·Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences

Abstract

Light fractionation, with a long dark interval, significantly increases the response to ALA-PDT in pre-clinical models and in non-melanoma skin cancer. We investigated if this increase in efficacy can be replicated in PAM 212 cells in vitro. The results show a significant decrease in cell survival after light fractionation which is dependent on the PpIX concentration and light dose of the first light fraction. This study supports the hypothesis that an underlying cellular mechanism is involved in the response to light fractionation in which a first light fraction leads to sub-lethally damaged cells that are sensitised to a second light fraction 2 hours later. The current study reveals the in vitro circumstances under which we can investigate the cellular pathways involved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c2pp25287b

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More PpIX production and better tissue oxygenation occurring during the 2 h period between two illuminations likely increase tumor cell sensitivity to the second treatment.

    “Although the detailed mechanism underlying increased response to double-illumination PDT remains unknown, more PpIX production and better tissue oxygenation occurring during the 2 h period between two illuminations likely increase tumor cell sensitivity to the second treatment [68,69].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Bruijn, H. S., Casas, A. G., Di Venosa, G., Gandara, L., Sterenborg, H. J. C. M., Batlle, A., & Robinson, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Robinson, Dominic J.
Venue
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences
Published
2013-02
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
241-245
ISSN
  • 1474-905X (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-9092
OpenAlex
W2003707844
Cited by
31
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
KWF Kankerbestrijding
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders
Keywords
photodynamic therapy, 5-aminolevulinic acid, protoporphyrin IX, non-melanoma skin cancer, sublethal damage, cell survival, light dose
MeSH terms
Aminolevulinic Acid, Animals, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Light, Photochemotherapy, Structure-Activity Relationship, Photosensitizing Agents, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review