The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breaking the concentration limit of optical single-molecule detection
Abstract
Over the last decade, single-molecule detection has been successfully utilized in the life sciences and materials science. Yet, single-molecule measurements only yield meaningful results when working in a suitable, narrow concentration range. On the one hand, diffraction limits the minimal size of the observation volume in optical single-molecule measurements and consequently a sample must be adequately diluted so that only one molecule resides within the observation volume. On the other hand, at ultra-low concentrations relevant for sensing, the detection volume has to be increased in order to detect molecules in a reasonable timespan. This in turn results in the loss of an optimal signal-to-noise ratio necessary for single-molecule detection. This review discusses the requirements for effective single-molecule fluorescence applications, reflects on the motivation for the extension of the dynamic concentration range of single-molecule measurements and reviews various approaches that have been introduced recently to solve these issues. For the high-concentration limit, we identify four promising strategies including molecular confinement, optical observation volume reduction, temporal separation of signals and well-conceived experimental designs that specifically circumvent the high concentration limit. The low concentration limit is addressed by increasing the measurement speed, parallelization, signal amplification and preconcentration. The further development of these ideas will expand our possibilities to interrogate research questions with the clarity and precision provided only by the single-molecule approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Anderson, N. L., & Anderson, N. G. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r200007-mcp200 · Cited by 4,414
Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility
Rifai, N., Gillette, M. A., & Carr, S. A. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1235 · Cited by 1,867
Cited by
Single-Molecule Plasmon Sensing: Current Status and Future Prospects
Taylor, A. B., & Zijlstra, P. (2017) · ACS Sensors · doi:10.1021/acssensors.7b00382 · Cited by 366
Single Biomolecule Imaging by Electrochemiluminescence
Liu, Y., Zhang, H., Li, B., Liu, J., Jiang, D., Liu, B., & Sojic, N. (2021) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c06673 · Cited by 303
Giant light-harvesting nanoantenna for single-molecule detection in ambient light
Trofymchuk, K., Reisch, A., Didier, P., Fras, F., Gilliot, P., Mely, Y., & Klymchenko, A. S. (2017) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-017-0001-7 · Cited by 175
Labeling and Single-Molecule Methods To Monitor G Protein-Coupled Receptor Dynamics
Tian, H., Fürstenberg, A., & Huber, T. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00084 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Holzmeister, P., Acuna, G. P., Grohmann, D., & Tinnefeld, P.
- Venue
- Chem. Soc. Rev.
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1014-1028
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2121236750
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breaking the concentration limit of optical single-molecule detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3cs60207a
- The paper
- Holzmeister, P., Acuna, G. P., Grohmann, D., & Tinnefeld, P. (2014). Breaking the concentration limit of optical single-molecule detection. Chem. Soc. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60207a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.