Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 634

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A guide to the synthesis of block copolymers using reversible-addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization

Open access
Keddie, Daniel J.·2014·Chem. Soc. Rev.

Abstract

The discovery of reversible-deactivation radical polymerization (RDRP) has provided an avenue for the synthesis of a vast array of polymers with a rich variety of functionality and architecture. The preparation of block copolymers has received significant focus in this burgeoning research field, due to their diverse properties and potential in a wide range of research environments. This tutorial review will address the important concepts behind the design and synthesis of block copolymers using reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. RAFT polymerization is arguably the most versatile of the RDRP methods due to its compatibility with a wide range of functional monomers and reaction media along with its relative ease of use. With an ever increasing array of researchers that possess a variety of backgrounds now turning to RDRP, and RAFT in particular, to prepare their required polymeric materials, it is pertinent to discuss the important points which enable the preparation of high purity functional block copolymers with targeted molar mass and narrow molar mass distribution using RAFT polymerization. The key principles of appropriate RAFT agent selection, the order of monomer addition in block synthesis and potential issues with maintaining high end-group fidelity are addressed. Additionally, techniques which allow block copolymers to be accessed using a combination of RAFT polymerization and complementary techniques are touched upon.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c3cs60290g

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Jenkins, 2010, Pure Appl. Chem., 82, 483, 10.1351/PAC-REP-08-04-03 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Rizzardo, 2012, Aust. J. Chem., 65, 945, 10.1071/CH12194 · DOI
  3. Hawker, 2001, Chem. Rev., 101, 3661, 10.1021/cr990119u · DOI · Paper page
  4. Matyjaszewski, 2001, Chem. Rev., 101, 2921, 10.1021/cr940534g · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chiefari, 1998, Macromolecules, 31, 5559, 10.1021/ma9804951 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Moad, 2012, Aust. J. Chem., 65, 985, 10.1071/CH12295 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Destarac, 2002, Macromol. Chem. Phys., 203, 2281, 10.1002/macp.200290002 · DOI
  8. Zard, 2006, Aust. J. Chem., 59, 663, 10.1071/CH06263 · DOI
  9. S. Lecommandoux , M.Lazzari and G.Liu, Block Copolymers in Nanoscience, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2008, pp. 1–7
  10. Bellas, 2007, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 46, 5082, 10.1002/anie.200604420 · doi:10.1002/anie.200604420
  11. Yamago, 2009, Chem. Rev., 109, 5051, 10.1021/cr9001269 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Moad, 2011, Polym. Int., 60, 9, 10.1002/pi.2988 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Willcock, 2010, Polym. Chem., 1, 149, 10.1039/B9PY00340A · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lowe, 2007, Prog. Polym. Sci., 32, 283, 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Zetterlund, 2008, Chem. Rev., 108, 3747, 10.1021/cr800242x · DOI · Paper page
  16. Chiefari, 2003, Macromolecules, 36, 2273, 10.1021/ma020883+ · DOI · Paper page
  17. Chong, 2003, Macromolecules, 36, 2256, 10.1021/ma020882h · DOI · Paper page
  18. Keddie, 2012, Macromolecules, 45, 5321, 10.1021/ma300410v · DOI · Paper page
  19. Mayadunne, 1999, Macromolecules, 32, 6977, 10.1021/ma9906837 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Destarac, 2002, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 23, 1049, 10.1002/marc.200290002 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Destarac, 2000, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 21, 1035, 10.1002/1521-3927(20001001)21:15<1035::AID-MARC1035>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Mayadunne, 2000, Macromolecules, 33, 243, 10.1021/ma991451a · DOI · Paper page
  23. Mayadunne, 2003, Macromolecules, 36, 1505, 10.1021/ma021219w · DOI · Paper page
  24. Keddie, 2013, Polym. Chem., 4, 3591, 10.1039/c3py00487b · DOI
  25. Perrier, 2005, Macromolecules, 38, 2033, 10.1021/ma047611m · DOI · Paper page
  26. Vandenbergh, 2013, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 51, 2366, 10.1002/pola.26593 · DOI
  27. Hadjiantoniou, 2010, Macromolecules, 43, 2713, 10.1021/ma902709p · DOI
  28. Guerrero-Sanchez, 2013, Polym. Chem., 4, 1857, 10.1039/c3py21135e · DOI
  29. Chaduc, 2011, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 32, 1270, 10.1002/marc.201100240 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Zhang, 2011, Macromolecules, 44, 7584, 10.1021/ma201515n · DOI · Paper page
  31. Jennings, 2012, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 4772, 10.1021/ja210577h · DOI
  32. Coote, 2005, Macromolecules, 38, 5774, 10.1021/ma050415a · DOI
  33. Theis, 2005, Aust. J. Chem., 58, 437, 10.1071/CH05069 · DOI
  34. Busch, 2007, Aust. J. Chem., 60, 788, 10.1071/CH07200 · DOI
  35. Benaglia, 2009, Macromolecules, 42, 9384, 10.1021/ma9021086 · DOI
  36. Keddie, 2011, Macromolecules, 44, 6738, 10.1021/ma200760q · DOI
  37. Keddie, 2012, Macromolecules, 45, 4205, 10.1021/ma300616g · DOI
  38. Zhang, 2013, Macromolecules, 46, 3985, 10.1021/ma4006457 · DOI
  39. Schmid, 2011, Macromolecules, 45, 87, 10.1021/ma2022452 · DOI
  40. Schmid, 2012, Macromolecules, 45, 6353, 10.1021/ma301117k · DOI
  41. Barner-Kowollik, 2011, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 50, 60, 10.1002/anie.201003707 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Becer, 2009, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 48, 4900, 10.1002/anie.200900755 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Bellas, 2007, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 28, 1415, 10.1002/marc.200700127 · DOI
  44. Harvison, 2011, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 32, 779, 10.1002/marc.201100156 · DOI
  45. Boyer, 2011, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 49, 551, 10.1002/pola.24482 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Gregory, 2012, Prog. Polym. Sci., 37, 38, 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Roth, 2011, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 32, 1123, 10.1002/marc.201100127 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Inglis, 2008, Macromolecules, 41, 4120, 10.1021/ma8002328 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Inglis, 2009, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 30, 1792, 10.1002/marc.200900363 · DOI

Cited by

See all 634

Metadata

Authors
Keddie, D. J.
Venue
Chem. Soc. Rev.
Published
2014
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
496-505
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W2076206297
Cited by
634
References
1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A guide to the synthesis of block copolymers using reversible-addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3cs60290g
The paper
Keddie, D. J. (2014). A guide to the synthesis of block copolymers using reversible-addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. Chem. Soc. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60290g

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.