The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From lab to fab: how must the polymer solar cell materials design change? – an industrial perspective
Abstract
Organic photovoltaic (OPV) devices, in particular polymer solar cells, made by solution processed organic materials have shown great promise as a disruptive technology for affordable electricity. Even though recent advances look impressive on paper, until now the commercialization of OPV has been hampered by the difficulty of converting lab produced “champion” cell figures into reliable industrial-scale product performances. A key factor to achieve this condition is to develop OPV materials (polymer donors, acceptors, buffer materials, electrodes materials and encapsulants) exhibiting the required technical and economic characteristics to be conveniently used in an industrial environment. The well established strategies for the design of materials for efficient lab-scale OPV devices are not sufficient when large-area printed panels are concerned. A number of additional requirements, normally not addressed in the laboratory context, must be met: the materials must be easily accessible as pure compounds in few synthetic steps from cheap starting compounds, need to be stable and soluble enough to afford ink formulations processable with roll-to-roll compatible equipment; solvent and solvent additives should be easily removable after printing, and possibly should be environmentally friendly compounds; the layers should achieve a stable morphology under mild conditions (low temperatures and short times); the above mentioned materials can be screened on glass substrates, but should be finally tested on plastic films, protected through a scalable encapsulation technique. The more researchers adhere to these guidelines, the greater the possibility for OPV to demonstrate at last its enormous potential on the industrial scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entropy of Charge Separation in Organic Photovoltaic Cells: The Benefit of Higher Dimensionality
Gregg, B. A. (2011) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz2012403 · Cited by 245
Cited by
Solvent Additives: Key Morphology‐Directing Agents for Solution‐Processed Organic Solar Cells
McDowell, C., Abdelsamie, M., Toney, M. F., & Bazan, G. C. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201707114 · Cited by 513
Recent progress in non-fullerene small molecule acceptors in organic solar cells (OSCs)
Chen, W., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c6tc05066b · Cited by 407
Li, L., Chakrabarty, S., Spyrou, K., Ober, C. K., & Giannelis, E. P. (2015) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01506 · Cited by 126
Cuesta, V., Vartanian, M., Cruz, P. D. L., Singhal, R., Sharma, G. D., & Langa, F. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c6ta09408b · Cited by 59
Regioregular Polythiophene–Porphyrin Supramolecular Copolymers for Optoelectronic Applications
Chevrier, M., Kesters, J., Blayo, C., Richeter, S., Van Der Lee, A., Coulembier, O., Surin, M., Mehdi, A., Lazzaroni, R., Evans, R. C., et al. (2016) · Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.1002/macp.201500280 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Po, R., Bernardi, A., Calabrese, A., Carbonera, C., Corso, G., & Pellegrino, A.
- Venue
- Energy & Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 925
- ISSN
- 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
- 1754-5706
- OpenAlex
- W2066542450
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From lab to fab: how must the polymer solar cell materials design change? – an industrial perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c3ee43460e
- The paper
- Po, R., Bernardi, A., Calabrese, A., Carbonera, C., Corso, G., & Pellegrino, A. (2014). From lab to fab: how must the polymer solar cell materials design change? – an industrial perspective. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee43460e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.