The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Centrifugal microfluidic platforms: advanced unit operations and applications
Open accessAbstract
Review on miniaturization, integration, and automation of laboratory processes within centrifugal microfluidic platforms. For efficient implementation of applications, building blocks are categorized into unit operations and process chains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Separation and detection of rare cells in a microfluidic disk via negative selection
Chen, C.-L., Chen, K.-C., Pan, Y.-C., Lee, T.-P., Hsiung, L.-C., Lin, C.-M., Chen, C.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Chiang, B.-L., & Wo, A. M. (2011) · Lab Chip · doi:10.1039/c0lc00332h · Cited by 72
Cited by
Passive and active droplet generation with microfluidics: a review
Zhu, P., & Wang, L. (2017) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc01018k · Cited by 1,238
Point-of-care diagnostics for infectious diseases: From methods to devices
Wang, C., Liu, M., Wang, Z., Li, S., Deng, Y., & He, N. (2021) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101092 · Cited by 622
Turning the Page: Advancing Paper-Based Microfluidics for Broad Diagnostic Application
Gong, M. M., & Sinton, D. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00024 · Cited by 573
Multiplexed Point-of-Care Testing – xPOCT
Dincer, C., Bruch, R., Kling, A., Dittrich, P. S., & Urban, G. A. (2017) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.03.013 · Cited by 503
PDMS microfluidics: A mini review
Raj M, K., & Chakraborty, S. (2020) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.48958 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Strohmeier, O., Keller, M., Schwemmer, F., Zehnle, S., Mark, D., von Stetten, F., Zengerle, R., & Paust, N.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6187-6229
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W2146426144
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
