Cited by 151Biosensors and Analytical DetectionOcular Surface and Contact LensElectrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Paper-based microfluidic system for tear electrolyte analysis

Open access
Yetisen, Ali K., Jiang, Nan, Tamayol, Ali, Ruiz-Esparza, Guillermo U., Zhang, Yu Shrike, Medina-Pando, Sofía, Gupta, Aditi, Wolffsohn, James S., Butt, Haider, Khademhosseini, Ali, Yun, Seok-Hyun·2017·Lab on a Chip

Abstract

This article describes a paper-based microfluidic system that quantifies the concentrations of tear electrolytes using a smartphone-based reader.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6lc01450j

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Craig, 1997, Optom. Vis. Sci., 74, 8, 10.1097/00006324-199701000-00014 · DOI
  2. Holly, 1984, Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc. U. K., 104, 374
  3. King-Smith, 2000, Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci., 41, 3348
  4. Begley, 2000, Optom. Vis. Sci., 77, 40, 10.1097/00006324-200001000-00012 · DOI
  5. Hamano, 1991, Nippon Ganka Kiyo, 42, 719
  6. Gilbard, 1994, Int. Ophthalmol. Clin., 34, 27, 10.1097/00004397-199403410-00005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yetisen, A. K., Jiang, N., Tamayol, A., Ruiz-Esparza, G. U., Zhang, Y. S., Medina-Pando, S., Gupta, A., Wolffsohn, J. S., Butt, H., Khademhosseini, A., & Yun, S.-H.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Biomaterials Innovation Research Center
  • Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (US)
  • Aston University (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Yetisen, Ali K.
  • Yun, Seok-Hyun
Venue
Lab on a Chip
Published
2017
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
1137-1148
ISSN
  • 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0197
OpenAlex
W2588545273
Cited by
151
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Lab on a Chip (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (201929/Z/16/Z)
  • Royal Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
Keywords
paper-based microfluidics, dry eye, pH measurement
MeSH terms
Electrolytes, Equipment Design, Humans, Paper, Potassium, Sodium, Tears, Dry Eye Syndromes, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review