CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 135Surgical Sutures and AdhesivesHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsWound Healing and Treatments

Mussel-inspired hydrogel tissue adhesives for wound closure

Open access
Rahimnejad, Maedeh, Zhong, Wen·2017·RSC Adv.
DOI 10.1039/c7ra06743g
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Tissue adhesives have been introduced as a promising alternative for the traditional wound closure method of suturing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c7ra06743g

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mussel-inspired injectable hydrogels simultaneously possess the minimally invasive property of injectable hydrogels and desirable functions provided by mussel-inspired components, which may include tissue adhesiveness and self-healing, antimicrobial, and antioxidant capabilities.

    “This type of hydrogel simultaneously possesses the minimally invasive property of injectable hydrogels and the desirable functions provided by mussel-inspired components, which may include tissue adhesiveness and self-healing, antimicrobial, and antioxidant capabilities [33].”

    From Mussel-Inspired Injectable Adhesive Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications (2024) · cites this paper as [33]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 145

  1. S. L. Basha, et al., Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2010, 203(3), 285.
  2. R. T. Forsch, Essentials of skin laceration repair, Am. Fam. Physician, 2008, 78(8), 945-951.
  3. P. Heger, et al., Aktuelle Studienlage zum Bauchdeckenverschluss, Der Chirurg, 2016, 87(9), 737-743.
  4. A. Islam and A. Ehsan, Comparison of suture material and technique of closure of subcutaneous fat and skin in caesarean section, N. Am. J. Med. Sci., 2011, 3(2), 85.
  5. P. Sergeant, et al., Needle-to-suture ratio, as well as suture material, impacts needle-hole bleeding in vascular anastomoses, Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg., 2016, 22(6), 813-816.
  6. N. Xu, et al., Light-activated sealing of skin wounds, Lasers Surg. Med., 2015, 47(1), 17-29.
  7. J. Hochberg, K. M. Meyer and M. D. Marion, Suture choice and other methods of skin closure, Surg. Clin. North Am., 2009, 89(3), 627-641.
  8. A. Duarte, et al., Surgical adhesives: systematic review of the main types and development forecast, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2012, 37(8), 1031-1050.
  9. A. Lauto, D. Mawad and L. J. R. Foster, Adhesive biomaterials for tissue reconstruction, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 2008, 83(4), 464-472.
  10. C. Yag-Howard, Sutures, needles, and tissue adhesives: a review for dermatologic surgery, Dermatol. Surg., 2014, 40, S3-S15.
  11. A. L. Tajirian and D. J. Goldberg, A review of sutures and other skin closure materials, J. Cosmet. Laser Ther., 2010, 12(6), 296-302.
  12. M. Rahimnejad, S. Derakhshanfar and W. Zhong, Biomaterials and tissue engineering for scar management in wound care, Burns & Trauma, 2017, 5(1), 4.
  13. S. Delibegović, et al., Tissue reaction to absorbable endoloop, nonabsorbable titanium staples, and polymer Hem-o-lok clip aer laparoscopic appendectomy, J. Soc. Laparoendosc. Surg., 2011, 15(1), 70.
  14. K. Yoshihara, et al., Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction, Acta Biomater., 2010, 6(9), 3573-3582.
  15. P. Spencer, et al., Adhesive/dentin interface: the weak link in the composite restoration, Ann. Biomed. Eng., 2010, 38(6), 1989-2003.
  16. A. Nordberg, et al., Highly adhesive phenolic compounds as interfacial primers for bone fracture xations, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2010, 2(3), 654-657.
  17. H.-S. Jeong, et al., Use of brin glue for open comminuted nasal bone fractures, J. Craniofac. Surg., 2010, 21(1), 75-78.
  18. J. Simson, et al., An orthopedic tissue adhesive for targeted delivery of intraoperative biologics, J. Orthop. Res., 2013, 31(3), 392-400.
  19. J. H. Ryu, et al., Catechol-functionalized chitosan/pluronic hydrogels for tissue adhesives and hemostatic materials, Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12(7), 2653-2659.
  20. N. Lang, et al., A blood-resistant surgical glue for minimally invasive repair of vessels and heart defects, Sci. Transl. Med., 2014, 6(218), 218ra6.
  21. N. Annabi, et al., Surgical materials: current challenges and nano-enabled solutions, Nano Today, 2014, 9(5), 574-589.
  22. S. Vyas, S. Kamdar and P. Vyas, Tissue adhesives in ophthalmology, J. Clin. Ophthalmol. Res., 2013, 1(2), 107- 112.
  23. W. Chen, et al., A mussel-inspired poly (g-glutamic acid) tissue adhesive with high wet strength for wound closure, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2017, 5(28), 5668-5678.
  24. K. A. Vakalopoulos, et al., Tissue adhesives in gastrointestinal anastomosis: a systematic review, J. Surg. Res., 2013, 180(2), 290-300.
  25. A. Sosnik, J. das Neves and B. Sarmento, Mucoadhesive polymers in the design of nano-drug delivery systems for administration by non-parenteral routes: a review, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2014, 39(12), 2030-2075.
  26. P. P. Spicer and A. G. Mikos, Fibrin glue as a drug delivery system, J. Controlled Release, 2010, 148(1), 49-55.
  27. S. H. Ku, J. S. Lee and C. B. Park, Spatial control of cell adhesion and patterning through mussel-inspired surface modication by polydopamine, Langmuir, 2010, 26(19), 15104-15108.
  28. K. Sun, et al., Using self-polymerized dopamine to modify the antifouling property of oligo (ethylene glycol) self- assembled monolayers and its application in cell patterning, Langmuir, 2011, 27(10), 5709-5712.
  29. H. J. Kim, et al., Mussel adhesion-employed water- immiscible uid bioadhesive for urinary stula sealing, Biomaterials, 2015, 72, 104-111.
  30. Y. Ai, et al., Study on the synthesis and properties of mussel mimetic poly (ethylene glycol) bioadhesive, J. Photochem. Photobiol., B, 2013, 120, 183-190.
  31. Y. Akdogan, et al., Intrinsic Surface-Drying Properties of Bioadhesive Proteins, Angew. Chem., 2014, 126(42), 11435- 11438.
  32. B.-H. Choi, et al., Highly puried mussel adhesive protein to secure biosafety for in vivo applications, Microb. Cell Fact., 2014, 13(1), 1.
  33. N. Hiraishi, et al., Mussel mimetic, bioadhesive polymers from plant derived materials, J. Investig. Clin. Dent., 2015, 6(1), 59-62.
  34. N. Bandara, H. Zeng and J. Wu, Marine mussel adhesion: biochemistry, mechanisms, and biomimetics, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 2013, 27(18-19), 2139-2162.
  35. S. Ornes, Mussels' sticky feet lead to applications, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2013, 110(42), 16697-16699.
  36. K. A. Bielefeld, S. Amini-Nik and B. A. Alman, Cutaneous wound healing: recruiting developmental pathways for regeneration, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 2013, 70(12), 2059-2081.
  37. M. C. Bloemen, et al., Prevention and curative management of hypertrophic scar formation, Burns, 2009, 35(4), 463-475.
  38. J. Boateng and O. Catanzano, Advanced therapeutic dressings for effective wound healing-A Review, J. Pharm. Sci., 2015, 104(11), 3653-3680.
  39. C. Profyris, C. Tziotzios and I. Do Vale, Cutaneous scarring: pathophysiology, molecular mechanisms, and scar reduction therapeutics: part I. The molecular basis of scar formation, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2012, 66(1), 1-10.
  40. C. Tziotzios, C. Profyris and J. Sterling, Cutaneous scarring: pathophysiology, molecular mechanisms, and scar reduction therapeutics: part II. Strategies to reduce scar formation aer dermatologic procedures, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2012, 66(1), 13-24.
  41. M. Tschoi, E. A. Hoy and M. S. Granick, Skin aps, Surg. Clin. North Am., 2009, 89(3), 643-658.
  42. M. Matsuda, M. Inoue and T. Taguchi, Enhanced bonding strength of a novel tissue adhesive consisting of cholesteryl group-modied gelatin and disuccinimidyl tartarate, J. Bioact. Compat. Polym., 2012, 27(1), 31-44.
  43. E. Y. Jeon, et al., Rapidly light-activated surgical protein glue inspired by mussel adhesion and insect structural crosslinking, Biomaterials, 2015, 67, 11-19.
  44. A. Chambers and M. Scarci, Is skin closure with cyanoacrylate glue effective for the prevention of sternal wound infections?, Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg., 2010, 10(5), 793-796.
  45. J. W. Gooch, Biocompatible polymeric materials and tourniquets for wounds, Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
  46. H. Lee, et al., Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings, Science, 2007, 318(5849), 426-430.
  47. B. P. Lee, et al., Mussel-inspired adhesives and coatings, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2011, 41, 99.
  48. S. C. Nicklisch and J. H. Waite, Mini-review: The role of redox in Dopa-mediated marine adhesion, Biofouling, 2012, 28(8), 865-877.
  49. J. Yu, et al., Mussel protein adhesion depends on interprotein thiol-mediated redox modulation, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2011, 7(9), 588-590.
  50. K. M. Gray, et al., Biomimetic fabrication of information- rich phenolic-chitosan lms, So Matter, 2011, 7(20), 9601-9615.
  51. C. Ghobril and M. Grinstaff, The chemistry and engineering of polymeric hydrogel adhesives for wound closure: a tutorial, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44(7), 1820-1835.
  52. H. Lee, B. P. Lee and P. B. Messersmith, A reversible wet/dry adhesive inspired by mussels and geckos, Nature, 2007, 448(7151), 338-341.
  53. C. R. Matos-Pérez, J. D. White and J. J. Wilker, Polymer composition and substrate inuences on the adhesive bonding of a biomimetic, cross-linking polymer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134(22), 9498-9505.
  54. S. M. Kang, et al., One-step modication of superhydrophobic surfaces by a mussel-inspired polymer coating, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49(49), 9401-9404.
  55. S. Moulay, Dopa/catechol-tethered polymers: Bioadhesives and biomimetic adhesive materials, Polym. Rev., 2014, 54(3), 436-513.
  56. M. Mehdizadeh and J. Yang, Design strategies and applications of tissue bioadhesives, Macromol. Biosci., 2013, 13(3), 271-288.
  57. J. H. Waite, Mussel adhesion -essential footwork, J. Exp. Biol., 2017, 220(4), 517-530.
  58. B. Krishnamoorthy, et al., Randomized prospective study comparing conventional subcuticular skin closure with Dermabond skin glue aer saphenous vein harvesting, Ann. Thorac. Surg., 2009, 88(5), 1445-1449.
  59. A. Dragu, et al., Foreign body reaction aer usage of tissue adhesives for skin closure: a case report and review of the literature, Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 2009, 129(2), 167- 169.
  60. Y. S. Choi, et al., Recombinant mussel adhesive protein fp-5 (MAP fp-5) as a bulk bioadhesive and surface coating material, Biofouling, 2011, 27(7), 729-737.
  61. T. Wang, J. Nie and D. Yang, Dextran and gelatin based photocrosslinkable tissue adhesive, Carbohydr. Polym., 2012, 90(4), 1428-1436.
  62. H. Shao and R. J. Stewart, Biomimetic underwater adhesives with environmentally triggered setting mechanisms, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22(6), 729-733.
  63. H. Zhang, et al., A biomimetic hyperbranched poly (amino ester)-based nanocomposite as a tunable bone adhesive for sternal closure, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2014, 2(26), 4067-4071.
  64. H. Zhang, et al., Mussel-inspired hyperbranched poly (amino ester) polymer as strong wet tissue adhesive, Biomaterials, 2014, 35(2), 711-719.
  65. J. Zhou, et al., Adhesion properties of catechol-based biodegradable amino acid-based poly (ester urea) copolymers inspired from mussel proteins, Biomacromolecules, 2014, 16(1), 266-274.
  66. B. K. Ahn, et al., High-performance mussel-inspired adhesives of reduced complexity, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 8663.
  67. S.-B. Lee, et al., Catechol-Functionalized Synthetic Polymer as a Dental Adhesive to Contaminated Dentin Surface for a Composite Restoration, Biomacromolecules, 2015, 16(8), 2265-2275.
  68. Y. Ji, et al., Mussel-inspired so-tissue adhesive based on poly (diol citrate) with catechol functionality, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med., 2016, 27(2), 1-9.
  69. S. Hong, et al., Supramolecular Metallo-Bioadhesive for Minimally Invasive Use, Adv. Mater., 2016, 28(39), 8675- 8680.
  70. A. Kawabata, et al., A foreign body granuloma aer the usage of polyglycolic acid mesh and brin glue for dural repair. A case report, J. Orthop. Sci., 2015, 22(2), 371-374.
  71. L. Yu and J. Ding, Injectable hydrogels as unique biomedical materials, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37(8), 1473- 1481.
  72. C. T. Huynh, M. K. Nguyen and D. S. Lee, Injectable block copolymer hydrogels: achievements and future challenges for biomedical applications, Macromolecules, 2011, 44(17), 6629-6636.
  73. M. D. Hager, et al., Self-Healing Materials, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22(47), 5424-5430.
  74. L. Moroni and J. H. Elisseeff, Biomaterials engineered for integration, Mater. Today, 2008, 11(5), 44-51.
  75. L. P. Bré, et al., Taking tissue adhesives to the future: from traditional synthetic to new biomimetic approaches, Biomater. Sci., 2013, 1(3), 239-253.
  76. J. I. Paez, et al., Gauging and tuning cross-linking kinetics of catechol-PEG adhesives via catecholamine functionalization, Biomacromolecules, 2015, 16(12), 3811- 3818.
  77. J. Sedó, et al., Catechol-Based Biomimetic Functional Materials, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25(5), 653-701.
  78. Y. Yang, et al., A biocompatible and functional adhesive amine-rich coating based on dopamine polymerization, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2015, 3(1), 72-81.
  79. J. H. An, et al., Surface modication using bio-inspired adhesive polymers based on polyaspartamide derivatives, Polym. Int., 2011, 60(11), 1581-1586.
  80. J. Xu, et al., Mollusk glue inspired mucoadhesives for biomedical applications, Langmuir, 2012, 28(39), 14010- 14017.
  81. Y. C. Choi, et al., Human gelatin tissue-adhesive hydrogels prepared by enzyme-mediated biosynthesis of DOPA and Fe 3+ ion crosslinking, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2014, 2(2), 201-209.
  82. W. Zhu, et al., A mussel-inspired double-crosslink tissue adhesive on rat mastectomy model: seroma prevention and in vivo biocompatibility, J. Surg. Res., 2017, 215, 173- 182.
  83. C. Fan, et al., A mussel-inspired double-crosslinked tissue adhesive intended for internal medical use, Acta Biomater., 2016, 33, 51-63.
  84. J. Shin, et al., Tissue Adhesive Catechol-Modied Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel for Effective, Minimally Invasive Cell Therapy, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2015, 25(25), 3814-3824.
  85. C. E. Brubaker, et al., Biological performance of mussel- inspired adhesive in extrahepatic islet transplantation, Biomaterials, 2010, 31(3), 420-427.
  86. D. G. Barrett, G. G. Bushnell and P. B. Messersmith, Mechanically robust, negative-swelling, mussel-inspired tissue adhesives, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 2013, 2(5), 745- 755.
  87. C. Li, et al., Photocrosslinkable bioadhesive based on dextran and PEG derivatives, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2014, 35, 300-306.
  88. Y. Liu, et al., Injectable dopamine-modied poly (ethylene glycol) nanocomposite hydrogel with enhanced adhesive property and bioactivity, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6(19), 16982-16992.
  89. S. Skelton, et al., Biomimetic adhesive containing nanocomposite hydrogel with enhanced materials properties, So Matter, 2013, 9(14), 3825-3833.
  90. C. L. Jenkins, H. J. Meredith and J. J. Wilker, Molecular weight effects upon the adhesive bonding of a mussel mimetic polymer, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2013, 5(11), 5091-5096.
  91. Y. Zhou, et al., Rapid gelling chitosan/polylysine hydrogel with enhanced bulk cohesive and interfacial adhesive force: mimicking features of epineurial matrix for peripheral nerve anastomosis, Biomacromolecules, 2016, 17(2), 622-630.
  92. K. A. Burke, D. C. Roberts and D. L. Kaplan, Silk Fibroin Aqueous-Based Adhesives Inspired by Mussel Adhesive Proteins, Biomacromolecules, 2015, 17(1), 237-245. 100
  93. Y. Li, et al., Gelatin Microgel Incorporated Poly (Ethylene Glycol)-based Bioadhesive with Enhanced Adhesive Property and Bioactivity, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8(19), 11980-11989. 101
  94. J. Guo, et al., Synthesis and characterization of anti- bacterial and anti-fungal citrate-based mussel-inspired bioadhesives, Biomaterials, 2016, 85, 204-217. 102
  95. J. Guo, et al., Click chemistry improved wet adhesion strength of mussel-inspired citrate-based antimicrobial bioadhesives, Biomaterials, 2017, 112, 275-286. 103
  96. Y. Ji, et al., Mussel-inspired so-tissue adhesive based on poly (diol citrate) with catechol functionality, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med., 2016, 27(2), 30. 104
  97. B. Yang, et al., Facilely prepared inexpensive and biocompatible self-healing hydrogel: a new injectable cell therapy carrier, Polym. Chem., 2012, 3(12), 3235-3238. 105
  98. B. K. Ahn, et al., Surface-initiated self-healing of polymers in aqueous media, Nat. Mater., 2014, 13(9), 867-872.
  99. N. Holten-Andersen, et al., pH-induced metal-ligand cross- links inspired by mussel yield self-healing polymer networks with near-covalent elastic moduli, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2011, 108(7), 2651-2655. 107
  100. M. Krogsgaard, et al., Self-healing mussel-inspired multi- pH-responsive hydrogels, Biomacromolecules, 2013, 14(2), 297-301. 108
  101. L. He, et al., pH responsive self-healing hydrogels formed by boronate-catechol complexation, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47(26), 7497-7499. 109
  102. M. Vatankhah-Varnoosfaderani, et al., Rapid self-healing and triple stimuli responsiveness of a supramolecular polymer gel based on boron-catechol interactions in a novel water-soluble mussel-inspired copolymer, Polym. Chem., 2014, 5(2), 512-523.
  103. M. Shan, et al., A pH, glucose, and dopamine triple- responsive, self-healable adhesive hydrogel formed by phenylborate-catechol complexation, Polym. Chem., 2017, 8(19), 2997-3005. 111
  104. S. Hong, et al., Hyaluronic Acid Catechol: A Biopolymer Exhibiting a pH-Dependent Adhesive or Cohesive Property for Human Neural Stem Cell Engineering, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2013, 23(14), 1774-1780. 112
  105. P. Sun, et al., Facile Preparation of Mussel-Inspired Polyurethane Hydrogel and Its Rapid Curing Behavior, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6(15), 12495-12504.
  106. M. Cencer, et al., Effect of pH on the rate of curing and bioadhesive properties of dopamine functionalized poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels, Biomacromolecules, 2014, 15(8), 2861-2869.
  107. M. Cencer, et al., Effect of nitro-functionalization on the cross-linking and bioadhesion of biomimetic adhesive moiety, Biomacromolecules, 2014, 16(1), 404-410. 115
  108. B. J. Kim, et al., Mussel-mimetic protein-based adhesive hydrogel, Biomacromolecules, 2014, 15(5), 1579-1585.
  109. B. Yang, et al., In Vivo Residue-Specic Dopa-Incorporated Engineered Mussel Bioglue with Enhanced Adhesion and Water Resistance, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53(49), 13360-13364.
  110. Y. Lee, et al., Thermo-sensitive, injectable, and tissue adhesive sol-gel transition hyaluronic acid/pluronic composite hydrogels prepared from bio-inspired catechol- thiol reaction, So Matter, 2010, 6(5), 977-983.
  111. H. Zhang, et al., On-demand and negative-thermo-swelling tissue adhesive based on highly branched ambivalent PEG- catechol copolymers, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2015, 3(31), 6420- 6428. 119
  112. B. Laulicht, et al., Bioinspired Bioadhesive Polymers: Dopa- Modied Poly (acrylic acid) Derivatives, Macromol. Biosci., 2012, 12(11), 1555-1565. 120
  113. C. J. Kastrup, et al., Painting blood vessels and atherosclerotic plaques with an adhesive drug depot, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2012, 109(52), 21444-21449.
  114. D. E. Fullenkamp, et al., Mussel-inspired silver-releasing antibacterial hydrogels, Biomaterials, 2012, 33(15), 3783- 3791. 122
  115. S. Lim, et al., Bioadhesive Nanoaggregates Based on Polyaspartamide-g-C18/DOPA for Wound Healing, Biomacromolecules, 2017, 18(8), 2402-2409.
  116. C. Gong, et al., Injectable dopamine-modied poly (a, b- aspartic acid) nanocomposite hydrogel as bioadhesive drug delivery system, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A, 2017, 105(4), 1000-1008.
  117. L. S. M. Teixeira, et al., Enzyme-catalyzed crosslinkable hydrogels: emerging strategies for tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 2012, 33(5), 1281-1290.
  118. C. E. Brubaker and P. B. Messersmith, Enzymatically degradable mussel-inspired adhesive hydrogel, Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12(12), 4326-4334.
  119. B. P. Lee and S. Konst, Novel hydrogel actuator inspired by reversible mussel adhesive protein chemistry, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26(21), 3415-3419. 127
  120. A. B. South and L. A. Lyon, Autonomic Self-Healing of Hydrogel Thin Films, Angew. Chem., 2010, 122(4), 779-783.
  121. W. Liu, S. Thomopoulos and Y. Xia, Electrospun nanobers for regenerative medicine, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 2012, 1(1), 10-25. 129
  122. H. Zeng, et al., Strong reversible Fe3+-mediated bridging between dopa-containing protein lms in water, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2010, 107(29), 12850-12853. 130
  123. J. L. Murphy, et al., Adhesive performance of biomimetic adhesive-coated biologic scaffolds, Biomacromolecules, 2010, 11(11), 2976-2984. 131
  124. B. J. Sparks, et al., Mussel-inspired thiol-ene polymer networks: Inuencing network properties and adhesion with catechol functionality, Chem. Mater., 2012, 24(18), 3633-3642. 132
  125. K. Kim, et al., Bio-inspired catechol conjugation converts water-insoluble chitosan into a highly water-soluble, adhesive chitosan derivative for hydrogels and LbL assembly, Biomater. Sci., 2013, 1(7), 783-790.
  126. D. X. Oh and D. S. Hwang, A biomimetic chitosan composite with improved mechanical properties in wet conditions, Biotechnol. Prog., 2013, 29(2), 505-512.
  127. Y. M. Shin, et al., Bio-inspired Immobilization of Cell- Adhesive Ligands on Electrospun Nanobrous Patches for Cell Delivery, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2013, 298(5), 555-564. 135
  128. Y. Zhang, et al., Highly-branched poly (N- isopropylacrylamide) as a component in poly (dopamine) lms, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2013, 117(36), 10504-10512.
  129. L. Guo, et al., A mussel-inspired polydopamine coating as a versatile platform for the in situ synthesis of graphene- based nanocomposites, Nanoscale, 2012, 4(19), 5864-5867.
  130. C. Cheng, et al., General and biomimetic approach to biopolymer-functionalized graphene oxide nanosheet through adhesive dopamine, Biomacromolecules, 2012, 13(12), 4236-4246. 138
  131. L. Ge, et al., Polydopamine-coated paper-stack nanobrous membranes enhancing adipose stem cells' adhesion and osteogenic differentiation, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2014, 2(40), 6917-6923.
  132. A. I. Neto, et al., Nanostructured Polymeric Coatings Based on Chitosan and Dopamine-Modied Hyaluronic Acid for Biomedical Applications, Small, 2014, 10(12), 2459-2469.
  133. J. H. Ryu, et al., Bio-Inspired, Water-Soluble to Insoluble Self-Conversion for Flexible, Biocompatible, Transparent, Catecholamine Polysaccharide Thin Films, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2014, 24(48), 7709-7716. 141
  134. J. Jiang, et al., Mussel-inspired nanobrous sheet for suture-less stomach incision surgery, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51(41), 8695-8698. 142
  135. Y. Zhang, et al., Mixed poly (dopamine)/poly (l- lysine)(composite) coatings: from assembly to interaction with endothelial cells, Biomater. Sci., 2015, 3(8), 1188-1196.
  136. M. M. Zieger, et al., Ultrathin Monomolecular Films and Robust Assemblies Based on Cyclic Catechols, Langmuir, 2017, 33(3), 670-679. 144
  137. K. Olofsson, et al., Activated dopamine derivatives as primers for adhesive-patch xation of bone fractures, RSC Adv., 2016, 6(31), 26398-26405.
  138. F. Scognamiglio, et al., Enhanced bioadhesivity of dopamine- functionalized polysaccharidic membranes for general surgery applications, Acta Biomater., 2016, 44, 232-242. 146
  139. F. Scognamiglio, et al., Adhesive coatings based on melanin-like nanoparticles for surgical membranes, Colloids Surf., B, 2017, 155, 553-559. 147
  140. L. Han, et al., Mussel-Inspired Adhesive and Tough Hydrogel Based on Nanoclay Conned Dopamine Polymerization, ACS Nano, 2017, 11(3), 2561-2574. 148
  141. J. Longo, et al., Stable Bioactive Enzyme-Containing Multilayer Films Based on Covalent Cross-Linking from Mussel-Inspired Adhesives, Langmuir, 2015, 31(45), 12447-12454. 149
  142. H. Yuk, et al., Tough bonding of hydrogels to diverse non- porous surfaces, Nat. Mater., 2016, 15(2), 190-196.
  143. M. Xing, et al., Adhesion force studies of nanobers and nanoparticles, Langmuir, 2010, 26(14), 11809-11814.
  144. M. Mehdizadeh, et al., Injectable citrate-based mussel- inspired tissue bioadhesives with high wet strength for sutureless wound closure, Biomaterials, 2012, 33(32), 7972-7983. 152
  145. P. Kord Forooshani and B. P. Lee, Recent approaches in designing bioadhesive materials inspired by mussel adhesive protein, J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem., 2016, 55(1), 9-33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahimnejad, M., & Zhong, W.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Zhong, Wen
ORCID
Venue
RSC Adv.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2017
Volume
7
Issue
75
Pages
47380-47396
ISSN
2046-2069 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1039/c7ra06743g
OpenAlex
W2761845156
Cited by
135
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
RSC Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
mussel-inspired adhesives, hydrogels, tissue adhesives, wound closure, biomimetic materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review