CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 27Organic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryTiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Porphyrin based push–pull conjugates as donors for solution-processed bulk heterojunction solar cells: a case of metal-dependent power conversion efficiency

Mishra, Ruchika, Regar, Ramprasad, Singhal, Rahul, Panini, Piyush, Sharma, Ganesh D., Sankar, Jeyaraman·2017·Journal of Materials Chemistry A
DOI 10.1039/c7ta05338j
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We demonstrate here the effect of metals in the porphyrin core of a PBI–porphyrin conjugate on the power conversion efficiency.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c7ta05338j

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PCE values for C24(Ni), C25(Cu) and C26(Zn) were 4.51%, 5.42% and 6.18%, with Jsc of 9.34, 10.13 and 12.25 mA cm−2, respectively.

    “The PCE values were found to be 4.51%, 5.42% and 6.18% with a J sc of 9.34 mA cm 2 , 10.13 mA cm 2 and 12.25 mA cm 2 , respectively, for C24 (Ni), C25 (Cu) and C26 (Zn).”

    From Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells (2018) · cites this paper as [79]

  • The C26(Zn)-based device showed a relatively lower Voc due to its high-lying HOMO.

    “However, the C26 (Zn) based device showed a relatively lower V oc due to its high-lying HOMO.”

    From Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells (2018) · cites this paper as [79]

  • All devices showed similar electron mobility, but the C26(Zn)-based device showed a higher hole mobility compared to the others.

    “All devices showed similar electronmobility, but the C26 (Zn) based device showed a higher holemobility compared to the others.”

    From Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells (2018) · cites this paper as [79]

  • Low energy loss is another promising feature of C26(Zn).

    “Low energy loss is another promising feature of C26 (Zn).”

    From Recent progress in porphyrin-based materials for organic solar cells (2018) · cites this paper as [79]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. C. Brabec , U.Scherf and V.Dyakonov, Organic Photovoltaics: Materials, Device Physics, and Manufacturing Technologies, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2nd edn, 2014 · DOI
  2. Heeger, 2013, Adv. Mater., 26, 10, 10.1002/adma.201304373 · DOI
  3. Krebs, 2013, Adv. Mater., 26, 29, 10.1002/adma.201302031 · DOI
  4. Yu, 1995, Science, 270, 1789, 10.1126/science.270.5243.1789 · DOI
  5. Mishra, 2012, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 51, 2020, 10.1002/anie.201102326 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Dou, 2013, Adv. Mater., 25, 6642, 10.1002/adma.201302563 · DOI
  7. Luo, 2016, Small, 12, 1547, 10.1002/smll.201502775 · DOI
  8. Nakamura, 2007, Chem. Soc. Rev., 36, 831, 10.1039/b618854k · DOI
  9. Guldi, 2011, Chem. Commun., 47, 606, 10.1039/C0CC02411B · DOI
  10. Ziessel, 2011, Chem. Commun., 47, 611, 10.1039/C0CC02687E · DOI
  11. Fukuzumi, 2014, Acc. Chem. Res., 47, 1455, 10.1021/ar400200u · DOI
  12. Lewis, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 15729, 10.1073/pnas.0603395103 · DOI
  13. Susumu, 2005, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, 5186, 10.1021/ja040243h · DOI
  14. Fernandez-Ariza, 2016, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 138, 12963, 10.1021/jacs.6b07432 · DOI
  15. Martínez-Díaz, 2010, Chem. Commun., 46, 7090, 10.1039/c0cc02213f · DOI
  16. Song, 2010, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 16356, 10.1021/ja107814s · DOI
  17. Mori, 2015, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 137, 2097, 10.1021/ja5130034 · DOI
  18. Senge, 2011, Chem. Commun., 47, 1943, 10.1039/c0cc03984e · DOI
  19. The Porphyrin Handbook, ed. K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith and R. Guilard, Academic Press, San Diego, 2000
  20. Higashino, 2016, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8, 15379, 10.1021/acsami.6b03806 · DOI
  21. Kesters, 2015, Adv. Energy Mater., 5, 1500218, 10.1002/aenm.201500218 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Wang, 2016, Chem. Sci., 7, 4301, 10.1039/C5SC04783H · DOI
  23. Rawson, 2014, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 17561, 10.1021/ja5097418 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kumar, 2015, Nanoscale, 7, 179, 10.1039/C4NR05565A · DOI · Paper page
  25. Huang, 2011, J. Org. Chem., 76, 2386, 10.1021/jo2001963 · DOI
  26. Langhals, 1995, Heterocycles, 40, 477, 10.3987/REV-94-SR2 · DOI
  27. Würthner, 2004, Chem. Commun., 1564, 10.1039/B401630K · DOI
  28. Weil, 2001, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 8101, 10.1021/ja010579g · DOI
  29. Alexy, 2014, Chem. Commun., 50, 14512, 10.1039/C4CC06853J · DOI
  30. You, 2004, Org. Lett., 6, 2401, 10.1021/ol049206l · DOI
  31. Kelley, 2007, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129, 3173, 10.1021/ja0664741 · DOI
  32. Odom, 2009, J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 10826, 10.1021/jp905214g · DOI
  33. Zhang, 2017, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 56, 2694, 10.1002/anie.201612090 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Nielsen, 2015, Acc. Chem. Res., 48, 2803, 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00199 · DOI
  35. Meng, 2016, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 138, 375, 10.1021/jacs.5b11149 · DOI
  36. W. T. Hadmojo , D.Yim, H.Aqoma, D. Y.Ryu, T. J.Shin, H. W.Kim, E.Hwang, W. D.Jang, I. H.Jung, H.-Y.Jang, Chem. Sci., 2017, 8, 50955100
  37. Laha, 2003, Org. Process Res. Dev., 7, 799, 10.1021/op034083q · DOI
  38. Sguerra, 2012, Dalton Trans., 41, 14683, 10.1039/c2dt32051g · DOI
  39. Yu, 2003, Inorg. Chem., 42, 6629, 10.1021/ic034559m · DOI
  40. Mandal, 2016, J. Phys. Chem. A, 120, 9719, 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b09483 · DOI
  41. Langhals, 2005, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 44, 2427, 10.1002/anie.200461610 · DOI
  42. Rajasingh, 2007, J. Org. Chem., 72, 5973, 10.1021/jo070367n · DOI
  43. Mishra, 2014, Chem.–Eur. J., 20, 5776, 10.1002/chem.201400099 · DOI
  44. Mishra, 2014, Org. Lett., 16, 3994, 10.1021/ol501822c · DOI
  45. Mihailetchi, 2006, Adv. Funct. Mater., 16, 699, 10.1002/adfm.200500420 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Tuladhar, 2005, Adv. Funct. Mater., 15, 1171, 10.1002/adfm.200400337 · DOI
  47. Veldman, 2009, Adv. Funct. Mater., 19, 1939, 10.1002/adfm.200900090 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mishra, R., Regar, R., Singhal, R., Panini, P., Sharma, G. D., & Sankar, J.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal (IN)
  • Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur (IN)
  • LNM Institute of Information Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Sharma, Ganesh D.
  • Sankar, Jeyaraman
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2017
Volume
5
Issue
30
Pages
15529-15533
ISSN
  • 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7496
DOI
10.1039/c7ta05338j
OpenAlex
W2734451626
Cited by
27
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Materials Chemistry A (publishedVersion)
Funders
Science and Engineering Research Board (EMR/2016/005768)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
Keywords
porphyrins, donor materials, bulk heterojunction solar cells, solution-processed solar cells, metal substitution, power conversion efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review