Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,133

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CO 2 reduction on gas-diffusion electrodes and why catalytic performance must be assessed at commercially-relevant conditions

Open access
Burdyny, Thomas, Smith, Wilson A.·2019·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

The substantial implications of high current densities on the local reaction environment and design of catalysts for electrochemical CO 2 reduction are addressed. The presented perspectives also reflect on current practices within the field and offer new opportunities for both future catalyst and system-focused research efforts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c8ee03134g

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 1,133

Metadata

Authors
Burdyny, T., & Smith, W. A.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2019
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
1442-1453
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W2909300313
Cited by
1,133
References
23
FWCI
25.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CO 2 reduction on gas-diffusion electrodes and why catalytic performance must be assessed at commercially-relevant conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c8ee03134g
The paper
Burdyny, T., & Smith, W. A. (2019). CO 2 reduction on gas-diffusion electrodes and why catalytic performance must be assessed at commercially-relevant conditions. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee03134g

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.