Cited by 1293D Printing in Biomedical ResearchMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Human stomach-on-a-chip with luminal flow and peristaltic-like motility

Open access
Lee, Kang Kug, McCauley, Heather A., Broda, Taylor R., Kofron, Matthew J., Wells, James M., Hong, Christian I.·2018·Lab on a Chip

Abstract

We created a human stomach-on-a-chip by using an innovative microfluidic imaging platform housing human gastric organoids (hGOs) with peristaltic luminal flow.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c8lc00910d

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OoC devices have improved the characteristics of hPSC-derived pancreatic islets, intestinal, stomach, and liver organoids by supporting physiological flow rates.

    “OoC devices have improved the characteristics of hPSC-derived pancreatic islets104, intestinal105, stomach106, and liver77 organoids by supporting physiological flow rates.”

    From Organoids (2022) · cites this paper as [105]

    The Introduction and Conclusions describe a chip that supports robust growth of hPSC-derived gastric organoids with controllable luminal flow that mimics in vivo flow. This supports the stomach-organoid portion of the sentence, but the paper does not establish that flow improved the organoids’ characteristics relative to a comparator. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, K. K., McCauley, H. A., Broda, T. R., Kofron, M. J., Wells, J. M., & Hong, C. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lee, Kang Kug
  • Hong, Christian I.
Venue
Lab on a Chip
Published
2018
Volume
18
Issue
20
Pages
3079-3085
ISSN
  • 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0197
OpenAlex
W2891700335
Cited by
129
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lab on a Chip (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI116491)
  • National Institutes of Health (U01DK103117)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (D12AP00005)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD093363)
  • American Diabetes Association (ADA-1-17-PDF-102)
  • University of Cincinnati
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
gastric organoids, human pluripotent stem cells, organ-on-a-chip, luminal flow, gastric motility, fluorescent dextran, gastric physiology, drug screening
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Motility, Humans, Organoids, Stomach, Tissue Array Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review