Cited by 57Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsElectrochemical sensors and biosensors

Point-of-use robotic sensors for simultaneous pressure detection and chemical analysis

Open access
Amit, Moran, Mishra, Rupesh K., Hoang, Quyen, Galan, Aida Martin, Wang, Joseph, Ng, Tse Nga·2019·Materials Horizons

Abstract

This work combined pressure and chemical sensors on disposable, retrofitting gloves to enable simultaneous tactile sensing and pesticide detection in a point-of-use robotic platform.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c8mh01412d

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adding chemical sensing to prostheses can prevent users from exposure to harmful chemicals and reduce potential harm.

    “Thus, adding chemical sensing capability to prostheses can prevent users from being exposed to harmful chemicals, such as organophosphate pesticide residues in agricultural products, and subsequently reduce the potential risk of harm.[239]”

    From Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human–Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics (2022) · cites this paper as [239]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says organophosphate pesticide residues in agricultural products pose a health threat and that remote robotic sampling can avoid placing people in unsafe environments. The study equips robotic manipulators with chemical sensors, not prostheses worn by users, so it does not establish that adding sensing to prostheses prevents users’ exposure or reduces their risk of harm. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]30. S. Ready, F. Endicott, G. L. Whiting, T. N. Ng, E. M. Chow and J. P. Lu, 3D Printed Electronics, NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference, 2013, vol. 1, p. 9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amit, M., Mishra, R. K., Hoang, Q., Galan, A. M., Wang, J., & Ng, T. N.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Department of Nanoengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Joseph
  • Ng, Tse Nga
Venue
Materials Horizons
Published
2019
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
604-611
ISSN
  • 2051-6347 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-6355
OpenAlex
W2905666732
Cited by
57
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials Horizons (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Council for Higher Education (Postdoctoral Fellowship for Women Scientists)
  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency (HDTRA 1-16-1-0013)
  • University of California, San Diego
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Keywords
robotic sensors, pressure sensing, chemical sensing, pesticide detection, tactile sensing, disposable gloves, simultaneous detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review