Cited by 46Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsHydrogen Storage and Materials

pH universal Ru@N-doped carbon catalyst for efficient and fast hydrogen evolution

Open access
Zheng, Baocheng, Ma, Li, Li, Bing, Chen, Dong, Li, Xueliang, He, Jianbo, Xie, Jianhui, Robert, Marc +1 more·2020·Catalysis Science & Technology

Abstract

An efficient and robust hydrogen evolution electrocatalyst of Ru nanoparticles embedded in N-doped carbon was obtained by using Bu 4 N[Ru(N)Cl 4 ] and Na 4 EDTA as precursors. It exhibits excellent catalytic activity in alkaline solutions and good performance in acidic media.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c9cy02552a

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interaction between Ru NPs and N-doped GA improved the dispersion of Ru NPs and restrained the exfoliation of Ru-NCs during the electrochemical reaction.

    “The interaction between Ru NPs and N-doped GA not only improved the dispersion of Ru NPs but also restrained the exfoliation of Ru-NCs during the electrochemical reaction [35].”

    From Nitrogen-doped graphene aerogel-supported ruthenium nanocrystals for pH-universal hydrogen evolution reaction (2022) · cites this paper as [35]

    The paper’s discussion of catalyst stability says that interactions between Ru nanoparticles and N-doped carbon can prevent nanoparticle detachment or agglomeration; it also links the carbon support’s pores to good Ru dispersion. The morphology section reports Ru nanoparticles distributed on a carbon skeleton. Neither passage identifies the support as N-doped GA or says that exfoliation of Ru-NCs was restrained during the electrochemical reaction. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the deconvoluted N 1s spectrum, three chemical states of N are observed: graphitic-N (401.0 eV), pyrrolic-N (399.7 eV), and pyridinic-N (398.0 eV).

    “In the deconvoluted N 1 s spectrum (Fig. 3(c)), three chemical states of N are observed: graphitic-N (401.0 eV), pyrrolic-N (399.7 eV), and pyridinic-N (398.0 eV) [33,35,36].”

    From Nitrogen-doped graphene aerogel-supported ruthenium nanocrystals for pH-universal hydrogen evolution reaction (2022) · cites this paper as [35]

    Section 3.1 identifies the same three N 1s chemical states and assigns them to peaks in the Ru@NC(1:5) spectrum. Its reported binding energies are 400.9 eV for graphitic N, 399.5 eV for pyrrolic N, and 398.4 eV for pyridinic N—not the exact values in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. N. S. Lewis and D. G. Nocera, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2006, 103, 15729-15735.
  2. J. Turner, G. Sverdrup, M. K. Mann, P.-C. Maness, B. Kroposki, M. Ghirardi, R. J. Evans and D. Blake, Int. J. Energy Res., 2008, 32, 379-407.
  3. G. W. Crabtree, M. S. Dresselhaus and M. V. Buchanan, Phys. Today, 2004, 57, 39-44.
  4. M. S. Dresselhaus and I. L. Thomas, Nature, 2001, 414, 332-337.
  5. J. A. Turner, Science, 2004, 305, 972.
  6. E. J. Popczun, J. R. McKone, C. G. Read, A. J. Biacchi, A. M. Wiltrout, N. S. Lewis and R. E. Schaak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 9267-9270.
  7. X. Bao, Y. Gong, Y. Chen, H. Zhang, Z. Wang, S. Mao, L. Xie, Z. Jiang and Y. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 11038-11043.
  8. X. Bao, J. Wang, X. Lian, H. Jin, S. Wang and Y. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 16249-16254.
  9. A. Gross, S. Schnur, E. Santos and W. Schmickler, Catalysis in Electrochemistry:From Fundamental Aspects to Strategies for Fuel Cell Development, Wiley, 2011.
  10. R. B. Gordon, M. Bertram and T. E. Graedel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2006, 103, 1209-1214.
  11. J. Shan, T. Ling, K. Davey, Y. Zheng and S.-Z. Qiao, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1900510.
  12. T. Tian, L. Huang, L. H. Ai and J. Jiang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 20985-20992.
  13. L. Liao, S. Wang, J. Xiao, X. Bian, Y. Zhang, M. D. Scanlon, X. Hu, Y. Tang, B. Liu and H. H. Girault, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, 387-392.
  14. X. Feng, H. Wang, X. Bo and L. Guo, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11, 8018-8024.
  15. P. Jiang, Q. Liu, Y. Liang, J. Tian, A. M. Asiri and X. Sun, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 12855-12859.
  16. J. Chen, H. Wang, Y. Gong and Y. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 11038-11043.
  17. Z.-F. Huang, J. Song, K. Li, M. Tahir, Y.-T. Wang, L. Pan, L. Wang, X. Zhang and J.-J. Zou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 1359-1365.
  18. Y. Zheng, Y. Jiao, Y. Zhu, L. H. Li, Y. Han, Y. Chen, M. Jaroniec and S.-Z. Qiao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 16174-16181.
  19. S. Nong, W. Dong, J. Yin, B. Dong, Y. Lu, X. Yuan, X. Wang, K. Bu, M. Chen, S. Jiang, L.-M. Liu, M. Sui and F. Huang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 5719-5727.
  20. J. Yang, B. Chen, X. Liu, W. Liu, Z. Li, J. Dong, W. Chen, W. Yan, T. Yao, X. Duan, Y. Wu and Y. Li, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 9495-9500.
  21. J. Mahmood, F. Li, S.-M. Jung, M. S. Okyay, I. Ahmad, S.-J. Kim, N. Park, H. Y. Jeong and J.-B. Baek, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2017, 12, 441-446.
  22. J. Xu, T. Liu, J. Li, B. Li, Y. Liu, B. Zhang, D. Xiong, I. Amorim, W. Li and L. Liu, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 1819-1827.
  23. Z. Pu, I. S. Amiinu, Z. Kou, W. Li and S. Mu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 11559-11564.
  24. J. Creus, J. De Tovar, N. Romero, J. Garcia-Anton, K. Philippot, R. Bofill and X. Sala, ChemSusChem, 2019, 12, 2493-2514.
  25. J. Creus, S. Drouet, S. Surinach, P. Lecante, V. Colliere, R. Poteau, K. Philippot, J. Garcia-Anton and X. Sala, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 11094-11102.
  26. Z.-L. Wang, K. Sun, J. Henzie, X. Hao, C. Li, T. Takei, Y.-M. Kang and Y. Yamauchi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 5848-5852.
  27. J. Wang, Z. Wei, S. Mao, H. Li and Y. Wang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 800-806.
  28. W. Gou, J. Li, W. Gao, Z. Xia, S. Zhang and Y. Ma, ChemCatChem, 2019, 11, 1970-1976.
  29. C. Xu, M. Ming, Q. Wang, C. Yang, G. Fan, Y. Wang, D. Gao, J. Bi and Y. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 14380-14386.
  30. W. L. Man, T. M. Tang, T. W. Wong, T. C. Lau, S. M. Peng and W. T. Wong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 478-479.
  31. C. L. Green and A. Kucernak, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 1036-1047.
  32. Y. Zheng, Y. Jiao, L. H. Li, T. Xing, Y. Chen, M. Jaroniec and S. Z. Qiao, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 5290-5296.
  33. J. Ftouni, A. Munoz-Murillo, A. Goryachev, J. P. Hofmann, E. J. M. Hensen, L. Lu, C. J. Kiely, P. C. A. Bruijnincx and B. M. Weckhuysen, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 5462-5472.
  34. X.-H. Li, S. Kurasch, U. Kaiser and M. Antonietti, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 9689-9692.
  35. R. Subbaraman, D. Tripkovic, D. Strmcnik, K.-C. Chang, M. Uchimura, A. P. Paulikas, V. Stamenkovic and N. M. Markovic, Science, 2011, 334, 1256-1260.
  36. J. L. C. Fajin, M. N. D. S. Cordeiro and J. R. B. Gomes, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2014, 118, 5832-5840.
  37. Y. Zheng, Y. Jiao, A. Vasileff and S.-Z. Qiao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 7568-7579.
  38. J. Su, Y. Yang, G. Xia, J. Chen, P. Jiang and Q. Chen, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 16029-16038.
  39. D. Luo, B. Zhou, Z. Li, X. Qin, Y. Wen, D. Shi, Q. Lu, M. Yang, H. Zhou and Y. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 2311-2317.
  40. Y. Liu, S. Liu, Y. Wang, Q. Zhang, L. Gu, S. Zhao, D. Xu, Y. Li, J. Bao and Z. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 2731-2734.
  41. E. Demir, S. Akbayrak, A. M. Onal and S. Ozkar, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 6299-6308.
  42. J. Yu, Q. He, G. Yang, W. Zhou, Z. Shao and M. Ni, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 9973-10011.
  43. G. Yan, C. Wu, H. Tan, X. Feng, L. Yan, H. Zang and Y. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 765-772.
  44. Q. Song, X. Qiao, L. Liu, Z. Xue, C. Huang and T. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2019, 55, 965-968.
  45. L. Castanheira, W. O. Silva, F. H. B. Lima, A. Crisci, L. Dubau and F. Maillard, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 2184-2194.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, B., Ma, L., Li, B., Chen, D., Li, X., He, J., Xie, J., Robert, M., & Lau, T.-C.
Affiliations
  • Hefei University of Technology (CN)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Xie, Jianhui
  • Robert, Marc
  • Lau, Tai-Chu
Venue
Catalysis Science & Technology
Published
2020
Volume
10
Issue
13
Pages
4405-4411
ISSN
  • 2044-4753 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-4761
OpenAlex
W3035361999
Cited by
46
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Catalysis Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • CityU Scholars (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21801058)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1808085QB28)
  • Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (11301618)
  • Institut Universitaire de France
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalysts, ruthenium nanoparticles, nitrogen-doped carbon, supported metal catalysts, alkaline water electrolysis, acidic electrolysis, pH universality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review