Cited by 27Heavy Metals in PlantsHeavy metals in environmentX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis

Visible cellular distribution of cadmium and zinc in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri ssp. gemmifera determined by 2-D X-ray fluorescence imaging using high-energy synchrotron radiation

Fukuda, Naoki, Kitajima, Nobuyuki, Terada, Yasuko, Abe, Tomoko, Nakai, Izumi, Hokura, Akiko·2020·Metallomics

Abstract

The striking sub-cellular distribution of cadmium (Cd) and zinc (Zn) in the Cd and Zn hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri ssp. gemmifera was revealed by microbeam X-ray microfluorescence analysis (μ-XRF) using high-energy synchrotron radiation. Plants were grown in hydroponics with various Cd and Zn concentrations. The concentration of Cd in the aerial portions of the plants increased with increasing Zn exposure and the transportation efficiency of Cd from the root to the shoot was affected by both the Cd and Zn concentrations in the nutrient solution. The μ-XRF imaging clearly showed that Cd and Zn were preferentially accumulated in trichomes on the leaf, while the distribution of Cd in the leaf was changed by Zn treatment. It was observed that Cd treated with a higher Zn concentration (20 μM Cd + 100 μM Zn) was distributed in the mesophyll tissue at high concentrations. In addition, μ-XRF imaging clarified that the distribution of Zn inside the leaf was different from that of Cd at a cellular level. Zn was primarily distributed in the mesophyll tissue of the leaf blade. In contrast, Cd was localized in the vascular bundle of the main vein. That is, Zn was transported to mesophyll tissue from the vascular bundle more efficiently than Cd. As seen above, we were able to study the difference of the distribution of Cd and Zn, which are congeners and behave similarly, inside the plant body at the cellular level in detail by high-energy μ-XRF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c9mt00243j

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fukuda, N., Kitajima, N., Terada, Y., Abe, T., Nakai, I., & Hokura, A.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo University of Science (JP)
  • Fujita Co., 2025-1 Ono, Atsugi, Kanagawa 243-0125, Japan
  • SPring-8 (JP)
  • RIKEN (JP)
Corresponding author
Hokura, Akiko
Venue
Metallomics
Published
2019-12-04
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
193-203
ISSN
  • 1756-5901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-591X
OpenAlex
W2994101783
Cited by
27
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Metallomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17350040, 20612008)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
cadmium hyperaccumulation, zinc hyperaccumulation, subcellular metal distribution, cadmium-zinc interaction, trichomes, vascular bundles, synchrotron X-ray fluorescence imaging, metal accumulation in leaves
MeSH terms
Cadmium, Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission, Zinc, Synchrotrons, Arabidopsis, Plant Leaves, Plant Roots, Hydroponics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review