CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial targeting of Bcl-2 on endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria in cancer cells by lipid nanoparticles

Pandey, Shalini, Patil, Sohan, Ballav, Nirmalya, Basu, Sudipta·2020·Journal of Materials Chemistry B
DOI 10.1039/d0tb00408a
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The presence of the same proteins at different sub-cellular locations with completely different functions adds to the complexity of signalling pathways in cancer.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d0tb00408a

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Grizzi, 2006, Cancer Cell Int., 6, 1, 10.1186/1475-2867-6-4 · DOI
  2. Rubin, 1985, Cancer Res., 45, 2935
  3. Nagai, 2017, J. Thorac. Dis., 9, 448, 10.21037/jtd.2017.02.75 · DOI
  4. Sonnenschein, 2009, Semin. Cancer Biol., 18, 372, 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.03.012 · DOI
  5. Sever, 2015, Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Med., 5, a006098, 10.1101/cshperspect.a006098 · DOI
  6. Martin, 2003, Cancer Cell, 4, 167, 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00216-2 · DOI
  7. Logue, 2012, Genes Dev., 26, 641, 10.1101/gad.186965.112 · DOI
  8. Zhu, 2016, Sci. Rep., 6, 1, 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Inder, 2008, Mol. Biol. Cell, 19, 4776, 10.1091/mbc.e08-04-0407 · DOI
  10. Loo, 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol., 10, e1003504, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003504 · DOI
  11. Park, 2018, Cell Chem. Biol., 25, 1242, 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.06.010 · DOI
  12. Yip, 2008, Oncogene, 27, 6398, 10.1038/onc.2008.307 · DOI
  13. Popgeorgiev, 2018, Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 6, 1, 10.3389/fcell.2018.00013 · DOI
  14. Akao, 1994, Cancer Res., 54, 2468
  15. Kirkin, 2004, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1644, 229, 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2003.08.009 · DOI
  16. Pihán, 2017, Cell Death Differ., 24, 1478, 10.1038/cdd.2017.82 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Clarke, 2012, Cancer Res., 72, 1321, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3213 · DOI
  18. Chipuk, 2008, Trends Cell Biol., 18, 157, 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.01.007 · DOI
  19. Lindsay, 2011, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1813, 532, 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.10.017 · DOI
  20. Brunelle, 2009, J. Cell Sci., 122, 437, 10.1242/jcs.031682 · DOI
  21. Hanahan, 2000, Cell, 100, 57, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Slomp, 2018, Front. Oncol., 8, 1, 10.3389/fonc.2018.00533 · DOI
  23. Coultas, 2003, Semin. Cancer Biol., 13, 115, 10.1016/S1044-579X(02)00129-3 · DOI
  24. Kelly, 2011, Cell Death Differ., 18, 1414, 10.1038/cdd.2011.17 · DOI
  25. Sharma, 2019, Cancers, 11, 1
  26. Vogler, 2009, Cell Death Differ., 16, 360, 10.1038/cdd.2008.137 · DOI
  27. Giepmans, 2006, Science, 312, 217, 10.1126/science.1124618 · DOI
  28. Wang, 2012, ACS Nano, 6, 5018, 10.1021/nn300571c · DOI
  29. Palvai, 2016, ChemNanoMat, 2, 201, 10.1002/cnma.201500195 · DOI
  30. Xiao, 2016, Chem. Sci., 7, 6153, 10.1039/C6SC01793B · DOI
  31. Xiao, 2017, Chem. Sci., 8, 7025, 10.1039/C7SC02330H · DOI
  32. Ghosh, 2019, Nanoscale, 11, 3326, 10.1039/C8NR08682F · DOI
  33. Ghosh, 2019, ACS Appl. Bio Mater., 2, 3992, 10.1021/acsabm.9b00532 · DOI
  34. Robertson, 1983, J. Biol. Chem., 258, 11039, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)44383-3 · DOI
  35. Murphy, 2008, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1777, 1028, 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.03.029 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Han, 2014, Mol. Pharmaceutics, 11, 2640, 10.1021/mp500038g · DOI
  37. Sengupta, 2012, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 109, 11294, 10.1073/pnas.1203129109 · DOI
  38. Nguyen, 2007, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104, 19512, 10.1073/pnas.0709443104 · DOI
  39. Mallick, 2016, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8, 13218, 10.1021/acsami.6b00263 · DOI
  40. Chen, 2013, Trends Cell Biol., 23, 1, 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.08.007 · DOI
  41. Oyadomari, 2004, Cell Death Differ., 11, 381, 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401373 · DOI
  42. Nishitoh, 2012, J. Biochem., 151, 217, 10.1093/jb/mvr143 · DOI
  43. Zeeshan, 2016, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 17, 1, 10.3390/ijms17030327 · DOI
  44. Wu, 2011, J. Visualized Exp., e3357
  45. Marquez, 2012, Am. J. Cancer Res., 2, 214
  46. Sica, 2015, Mol. Cell, 59, 522, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.021 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Ogata, 2006, Mol. Cell. Biol., 26, 9220, 10.1128/MCB.01453-06 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Porter, 1999, Cell Death Differ., 6, 99, 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400476 · DOI
  49. Tait, 2010, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 11, 621, 10.1038/nrm2952 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Petronilli, 1999, Biophys. J., 76, 725, 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77239-5 · DOI
  51. An, 2018, Nanoscale, 10, 9311, 10.1039/C8NR01376D · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Pandey, S., Patil, S., Ballav, N., & Basu, S.
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry B
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2020
Volume
8
Issue
19
Pages
4259-4266
ISSN
  • 2050-750X
  • 2050-7518
DOI
10.1039/d0tb00408a
Cited by
26
References
6
Language
en
Licence
rsc.li/journals-terms-of-use (am, 457 d)
Funders
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology (SB/NM/NB-1083/2017 (G))
  • Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune
  • Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
  • University Grants Commission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review