Cited by 13Algal biology and biofuel productionCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesHybrid Renewable Energy Systems

Direct flue gas capture for algae cultivation and subsequent valorization: Evaluating life cycle emissions and costs

Open access
Singh, Udayan, Naaz, Farah, Hawkins, Troy R., Weinberg, Ed, Banerjee, Sudhanya, Mroz, Robert, Ohri, Nidhi, Zhang, Jingyi +4 more·2025·Sustainable Energy & Fuels

Abstract

The article presents the greenhouse gas and cost implications of algae production in a photobioreactor using flue gas directly, and its subsequent valorization. Process sensitivities and design considerations are also discussed to guide future work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d5se00329f

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pilot-scale studies using direct flue-gas supply to algal photobioreactors show that carbon source identity is critical, because fossil and biogenic CO2 inputs can produce very different life-cycle emission outcomes.

    “Pilot-scale studies using direct flue-gas supply to algal photobioreactors also show that carbon source identity is critical, because fossil and biogenic CO2 inputs can produce very different life-cycle emission outcomes [224].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, U., Naaz, F., Hawkins, T. R., Weinberg, E., Banerjee, S., Mroz, R., Ohri, N., Zhang, J., Lee, Y.-Y., Chen, F., Hill, R., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • ESSRE Consulting, Inc., 20 Rucker Rd., Richboro, PA 18954, USA
  • HY-TEK Bio, 7900 Shore Road, Sparrows Point, MD 21219, USA
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
  • Singh, Udayan
  • Hawkins, Troy R.
Venue
Sustainable Energy & Fuels
Published
2025
Volume
9
Issue
16
Pages
4392-4403
ISSN
2398-4902 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411648866
Cited by
12
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 12
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Sustainable Energy & Fuels (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (DE-FE0031914, DE-FE0032188)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Keywords
flue gas capture, algae cultivation, photobioreactors, greenhouse gas emissions, life cycle assessment, cost analysis, process sensitivity, design considerations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review