Cited by 244Algal biology and biofuel productionCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Simultaneous flue gas bioremediation and reduction of microalgal biomass production costs

Douskova, I., Doucha, J., Livansky, K., Machat, J., Novak, P., Umysova, D., Zachleder, V., Vitova, M.·2009·Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

Abstract

A flue gas originating from a municipal waste incinerator was used as a source of CO(2) for the cultivation of the microalga Chlorella vulgaris, in order to decrease the biomass production costs and to bioremediate CO(2) simultaneously. The utilization of the flue gas containing 10-13% (v/v) CO(2) and 8-10% (v/v) O(2) for the photobioreactor agitation and CO(2) supply was proven to be convenient. The growth rate of algal cultures on the flue gas was even higher when compared with the control culture supplied by a mixture of pure CO(2) and air (11% (v/v) CO(2)). Correspondingly, the CO(2) fixation rate was also higher when using the flue gas (4.4 g CO(2) l(-1) 24 h(-1)) than using the control gas (3.0 g CO(2) l(-1) 24 h(-1)). The toxicological analysis of the biomass produced using untreated flue gas showed only a slight excess of mercury while all the other compounds (other heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans, and polychlorinated biphenyls) were below the limits required by the European Union foodstuff legislation. Fortunately, extending the flue gas treatment prior to the cultivation unit by a simple granulated activated carbon column led to an efficient absorption of gaseous mercury and to the algal biomass composition compliant with all the foodstuff legislation requirements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00253-008-1811-9

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Potential waste streams for algal culture include municipal wastewater to remove nitrates and phosphates before discharge, and flue gas of coal or other combustible-based power plants to capture sulfates and CO2.

    “Potential waste streams include municipal wastewater to remove nitrates and phosphates before discharge, and flue gas of coal or other combustible-based power plants to capture sulfates and CO2 [22–24].”

    From Biofuels from algae: Challenges and potential (2010) · cites this paper as [24]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douskova, I., Doucha, J., Livansky, K., Machat, J., Novak, P., Umysova, D., Zachleder, V., & Vitova, M.
Affiliations
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • Termizo (Czechia) (CZ)
Corresponding author
Zachleder, V.
Venue
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2009-02
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
179-185
ISSN
  • 0175-7598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0614
OpenAlex
W2027179973
Cited by
244
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
Chlorella vulgaris, microalgae cultivation, municipal solid waste incineration, CO2 utilization, CO2 fixation rate, heavy metal contamination, mercury removal, granular activated carbon, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated biphenyls
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Biotechnology, Carbon Dioxide, Gases, Biomass, Bioreactors, Chlorella vulgaris

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review