Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 438

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hydrophobic moments and protein structure

Eisenberg, David, Weiss, Robert M., Terwilliger, Thomas C., Wilcox, William·1982·Faraday Symposia of the Chemical Society

Abstract

The structure of a protein can be analysed in terms of what may be called the “hydrophobic moments” of (1) the entire molecule and (2) of the segments of secondary structure that make up the polypeptide chain. The zeroth moment is defined as the sum of the hydrophobicities of the amino-acid residues of the structure under consideration; it is the analogue of the net charge of a cluster of point charges. The first moment, or hydrophobic dipole moment, is the analogue of the electric dipole moment of a cluster of charges. Just as the electric dipole moment measures the asymmetry of the charge distribution, the hydrophobic dipole moment measures the amphiphilicity (asymmetry of hydrophobicity) of the structure. A large hydrophobic dipole moment indicates that a structure is predominantly hydrophobic on one side and predominantly hydrophilic on the other. A quadrupole hydrophobic moment may be similarly defined. It indicates whether a protein is more hydrophobic in its interior (as for a globular protein in aqueous solution) or at its surface (as for a membrane protein).The hydrophobic dipole moment is useful in two separate applications. The first, which we have discussed elsewhere [D. Eisenberg, R. M. Weiss and T. C. Terwilliger, Nature (London), 1982, 299, 371] relates the function and secondary structure of a region of protein structure to its amino-acid sequence. For example, sequences that form surface-seeking helices have large hydrophobic dipole moments. The second application is in the analysis of interactions of a segment or domain of a protein with neighbouring regions in the protein and with other parts of the environment. In this paper we examine the hydrophobic dipole moments in the known structures of nine globular proteins and find that the moments of neighbouring segments tend to point towards each other. This suggests that the hydrophobic dipole can serve as a simple and pictorial summary of some of the forces at work in the folding of proteins. We have also found that the interactions of some macromolecules with an apolar–polar interface can be conveniently described in terms of the hydrophobic moments of the molecule and a “hydrophobic field” which reflects the hydrophobicity of the environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/fs9821700109

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 438

Metadata

Authors
Eisenberg, D., Weiss, R. M., Terwilliger, T. C., & Wilcox, W.
Venue
Faraday Symposia of the Chemical Society
Published
1982
Volume
17
Pages
109
ISSN
0301-5696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979764309
Cited by
438
References
0
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrophobic moments and protein structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/fs9821700109
The paper
Eisenberg, D., Weiss, R. M., Terwilliger, T. C., & Wilcox, W. (1982). Hydrophobic moments and protein structure. Faraday Symposia of the Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1039/fs9821700109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.