The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The acute action of ammonia on rat brain metabolism in vivo
Open accessAbstract
1. Acute NH4+ toxicity was studied by using a new apparatus that removes and freezes the brains of conscious rats within 1s. 2. Brains were removed and frozen 5min after intraperitoneal injection of ammonium acetate (2–3min before the onset of convulsions). Arterial [NH4+] rose from less than 0.01 to 1.74mm at 4–5min. The concentrations of all glycolytic intermediates measured, except glucose 6-phosphate, were increased by the indicated percentage above the control value as follows: glucose (by 41%), fructose 1,6-diphosphate (by 133%), dihydroxyacetone phosphate (by 164%), α-glycerophosphate (by 45%), phosphoenolpyruvate (by 67%) and pyruvate (by 26%). 4. Citrate and α-oxoglutarate concentrations were unchanged and that of malate was increased (by 17%). 5. Adenine nucleotides and Pi concentrations were unchanged but the concentration of creatine phosphate decreased slightly (by 6%). 6. Brain [NH4+] increased from 0.2 to 1.53mm. Net glutamine synthesis occurred at an average rate of 0.33μmol/min per g. 7. The rate of brain glucose utilization was measured in vivo as 0.62μmol/min per g in controls and 0.81μmol/min per g after NH4+ injection. 8. The arteriovenous difference of glucose and O2 increased by 35%. 9. No significant arteriovenous differences of glutamate or glutamine were detected. Thus, although much NH4+ was incorporated into glutamine the latter was not rapidly released from the brain to the circulation. 10. Plasma [K+] increased from 3.3 to 5.4mm. 11. The results indicate that NH4+ stimulates oxidative metabolism but does not interfere with brain energy balance. The increased rate of oxidative metabolism could not be accounted for only on the basis of glutamine synthesis. We suggest that increased extracellular [NH4+] and [K+] decreased the resting transmembrane potential and stimulated Na+,K+-stimulated adenosine triphosphatase activity thus accounting for the increased metabolic rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Williamson, D., Lund, P., & Krebs, H. (1967) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj1030514 · Cited by 1,871
Cited by
Brain lactate metabolism: the discoveries and the controversies
Dienel, G. A. (2012) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2011.175 · Cited by 479
James, J. H., Jeppsson, B., Ziparo, V., & Fischer, J. (1979) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(79)92119-6 · Cited by 417
Sibson, N. R., Dhankhar, A., Mason, G. F., Behar, K. L., Rothman, D. L., & Shulman, R. G. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.6.2699 · Cited by 320
CEREBRAL ENERGY METABOLISM DURING EXPERIMENTAL STATUS EPILEPTICUS 1
Duffy, T. E., Howse, D. C., & Plum, F. (1975) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1975.tb03657.x · Cited by 220
Lin, Y., Stephenson, M. C., Xin, L., Napolitano, A., & Morris, P. G. (2012) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.33 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawkins, R. A., Miller, A. L., Nielsen, R. C., & Veech, R. L.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1973-08-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1001-1008
- ISSN
- 0264-6021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W117488228
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The acute action of ammonia on rat brain metabolism in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bj1341001
- The paper
- Hawkins, R. A., Miller, A. L., Nielsen, R. C., & Veech, R. L. (1973). The acute action of ammonia on rat brain metabolism in vivo. Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1341001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.