The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Specificity and versatility of SH3 and other proline-recognition domains: structural basis and implications for cellular signal transduction
Open accessAbstract
Protein–protein interactions occurring via the recognition of short peptide sequences by modular interaction domains play a central role in the assembly of signalling protein complexes and larger protein networks that regulate cellular behaviour. In addition to spatial and temporal factors, the specificity of signal transduction is intimately associated with the specificity of many co-operative, pairwise binding events upon which various pathways are built. Although protein interaction domains are usually identified via the recognition code, the consensus sequence motif, to which they selectively bind, they are highly versatile and play diverse roles in the cell. For example, a given interaction domain can bind to multiple sequences that exhibit no apparent identity, and, on the other hand, domains of the same class or different classes may favour a given consensus motif. This promiscuity in ligand selection is typified by the SH3 (Src homology 3) domain and several other interaction modules that commonly recognize proline-rich sequences. Furthermore, interaction domains are highly adaptable, a property that is essential for the evolution of novel pathways and modulation of signalling dynamics. The ability of certain interaction domains to perform multiple tasks, however, poses a challenge for the cell to control signalling specificity when cross-talk between pathways is undesired. Extensive structural and biochemical analysis of many interaction domains in recent years has started to shed light on the molecular basis underlying specific compared with diverse binding events that are mediated by interaction domains and the role affinity plays in affecting domain specificity and regulating cellular signal transduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative Genomics of the Eukaryotes
Rubin, G. M., Yandell, M. D., Wortman, J. R., Gabor, G. L., Miklos, Nelson, C. R., Hariharan, I. K., Fortini, M. E., Li, P. W., Apweiler, R., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2204 · Cited by 1,698
The amphiphysin family of proteins and their role in endocytosis at the synapse
Wigge, P., & McMahon, H. T. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01264-8 · Cited by 247
Cited by
Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases
Lemmon, M. A., & Schlessinger, J. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.06.011 · Cited by 7,929
Bacterial ferrous iron transport: the Feo system
Lau, C. K. Y., Krewulak, K. D., & Vogel, H. J. (2016) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv049 · Cited by 428
CYLD: a tumor suppressor deubiquitinase regulating NF-κB activation and diverse biological processes
Sun, S.-C. (2010) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2009.43 · Cited by 400
Loops Govern SH2 Domain Specificity by Controlling Access to Binding Pockets
Kaneko, T., Huang, H., Zhao, B., Li, L., Liu, H., Voss, C. K., Wu, C., Schiller, M. R., & Li, S. S.-C. (2010) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2000796 · Cited by 146
Self-citationToward a mechanistic understanding of Feo-mediated ferrous iron uptake
Sestok, A. E., Linkous, R. O., & Smith, A. T. (2018) · Metallomics · doi:10.1039/c8mt00097b · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, S. S.-C.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 2005-09-05
- Volume
- 390
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 641-653
- ISSN
- 0264-6021 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8728
- OpenAlex
- W2061636592
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specificity and versatility of SH3 and other proline-recognition domains: structural basis and implications for cellular signal transduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bj20050411
- The paper
- Li, S. S.-C. (2005). Specificity and versatility of SH3 and other proline-recognition domains: structural basis and implications for cellular signal transduction. Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj20050411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.