Cited by 403Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusIon Transport and Channel RegulationBarrier Structure and Function Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 126 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perivascular spaces, glymphatic dysfunction, and small vessel disease

Open access

Abstract

Cerebral small vessel diseases (SVDs) range broadly in etiology but share remarkably overlapping pathology. Features of SVD including enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS) and formation of abluminal protein deposits cannot be completely explained by the putative pathophysiology. The recently discovered glymphatic system provides a new perspective to potentially address these gaps. This work provides a comprehensive review of the known factors that regulate glymphatic function and the disease mechanisms underlying glymphatic impairment emphasizing the role that aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-lined perivascular spaces (PVSs), cerebrovascular pulsatility, and metabolite clearance play in normal CNS physiology. This review also discusses the implications that glymphatic impairment may have on SVD inception and progression with the aim of exploring novel therapeutic targets and highlighting the key questions that remain to be answered.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/cs20160381

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 127 references

1 of the 127 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 402

Metadata

Authors
Mestre, H., Kostrikov, S., Mehta, R. I., & Nedergaard, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Nedergaard, Maiken
Venue
Clinical Science
Published
2017-08-10
Volume
131
Issue
17
Pages
2257-2274
ISSN
  • 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8736
OpenAlex
W2742497781
Cited by
403
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Clinical Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Lundbeckfonden (R155-2016–552)
  • Israel Science Foundation
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF13OC0004258)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG048769)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS078304, K08NS089830, R01NS100366)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
cerebral small vessel disease, enlarged perivascular spaces, glymphatic system, glymphatic dysfunction, aquaporin-4, perivascular spaces, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Vessels, Brain, Humans, Aquaporin 4, Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review