The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice: Development of a Standardized Clinical Protocol
Abstract
Purpose: This article presents the development of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) following a consensus conference on perceptual voice quality measurement sponsored by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association’s Special Interest Division 3, Voice and Voice Disorders. The CAPE-V protocol and recording form were designed to promote a standardized approach to evaluating and documenting auditory-perceptual judgments of vocal quality. Method: A summary of the consensus conference proceedings and the factors considered by the authors in developing this instrument are included. Conclusion: The CAPE-V form and instructions, included as appendices to this article, enable clinicians to document perceived voice quality deviations following a standard (i.e., consistent and specified) protocol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Barkmeier J., 2003, Update on the use of the CAPE-V tool
- Barkmeier J., 2002, Report of the consensus conference on auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice
- Berg B. & Edén S. (2003). Perceptuell bedömning av röstkvalitet hos tre organiska röststörningar—jämförelse mellan Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) och Stockholm Voice Evaluation Approach (SVEA). [Perceptual evaluation of voice quality in three organic voice disorders—a comparison between Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) and Stockholm Voice Evaluation Approach (SVEA)]. Unpublished master’s thesis Karolinska Institute Stockholm Sweden
- Callan D., 2000, Voice quality measurement, 103
- Carding P. N., 2000, Formal perceptual evaluation of voice quality in the United Kingdom, Logopedics, Phoniatrics, Vocology, 25, 133, 10.1080/14015430050175860 · DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/009) · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/009
- DeBodt M. S., 1997, Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: Influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality, Journal of Voice, 11, 74, 10.1016/S0892-1997(97)80026-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Fairbanks G., 1960, Voice and articulation drillbook
- Gerratt B. R., 2000, Theoretical and methodological development in the study of pathological voice quality, Journal of Phonetics, 28, 335, 10.1006/jpho.2000.0120 · DOI
- 10.1121/1.1409969 · DOI
- 10.1044/jshr.3601.14 · DOI · Paper page
- Gescheider G. A., 2002, Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology, 91
- Hammarberg B., 2000, Voice research and clinical needs, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 52, 93, 10.1159/000021517 · DOI
- Hillman R., 2003, Overview of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) instrument developed by ASHA Special Interest Division 3
- Hirano M., 1981, Clinical examination of voice
- Houtsma A. J. M., 1995, Handbook of perception and cognition, 276
- 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1044/1058-0360.0503.07 · DOI · Paper page
- Kreiman J., 1998, Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 1598, 10.1121/1.424372 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1121/1.1289362 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1044/jshr.3601.21 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1044/jshr.3503.512 · DOI · Paper page
- Marks L., 1998, Measurement, judgment, and decision making
- 10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80059-3 · doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(98)80059-3
- Shrivastav R., 2006, Multidimensional scaling of breathy voice quality: Individual differences in perception, Journal of Voice, 20, 211, 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.04.005 · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.04.005
- Shrivastav R., 2006, Now hear this: Improving perceptual evaluations of voice quality
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/022) · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/022
- Wilson D. K., 1987, Voice problems of children
- Zraick R., 2007, Results of the CAPE-V validation study
- Zwicker E., 1999, Psychoacoustics: Facts and models, 10.1007/978-3-662-09562-1 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Patel, R. R., Awan, S. N., Barkmeier-Kraemer, J., Courey, M., Deliyski, D., Eadie, T., Paul, D., Švec, J. G., & Hillman, R. (2018) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2018_ajslp-17-0009 · Cited by 818
Self-citationMaryn, Y., Corthals, P., Van Cauwenberge, P., Roy, N., & De Bodt, M. (2010) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.12.014 · Cited by 427
Guidelines for Speech Recording and Acoustic Analyses in Dysarthrias of Movement Disorders
Rusz, J., Tykalova, T., Ramig, L. O., & Tripoliti, E. (2021) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.28465 · Cited by 170
Hammer, M. J., & Barlow, S. M. (2010) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2048-2 · Cited by 108
Lechien, J. R., Geneid, A., Bohlender, J. E., Cantarella, G., Avellaneda, J. C., Desuter, G., Sjogren, E. V., Finck, C., Hans, S., Hess, M., et al. (2023) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-023-08211-6 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Kempster, G. B., Gerratt, B. R., Verdolini Abbott, K., Barkmeier-Kraemer, J., & Hillman, R. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 124-132
- ISSN
- 1058-0360 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9110
- DOI
- 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017
- OpenAlex
- W1994997260
- Cited by
- 1,008
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice: Development of a Standardized Clinical Protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017
- The paper
- Kempster, G. B., Gerratt, B. R., Verdolini Abbott, K., Barkmeier-Kraemer, J., & Hillman, R. E. (2009). Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice: Development of a Standardized Clinical Protocol. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
