The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hearing and Believing: Some Limits to the Auditory-Perceptual Assessment of Speech and Voice Disorders
Abstract
Speech-language pathology relies on auditory-perceptual judgment as a central tool for classifying and measuring a variety of disorders of communication. Over the history of the field, a great deal has been written about the use of perceptual judgments for research and clinical practice. Auditory-perceptual methods carry strong advantages of convenience, economy, and robustness, but it is also clear that these judgments are susceptible to a variety of sources of error and bias. Awareness of these threats to validity and reliability is a major step in the effective and refined use of perceptual methods. Several common themes are evident in contemporary research on the perceptual assessment of voice disorders, stuttering, dysarthria, aphasia, and apraxia of speech. These five disorders are taken as primary foci in a discussion that (a) identifies threats to reliability and validity, and (b) offers suggestions for the improvement of auditory-perceptual methods, whether used alone or in combination with instrumental techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
Hearing lips and seeing voices
MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/264746a0 · Cited by 6,183
Perception of the speech code.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020279 · Cited by 3,722
Flege, J. E. (1987) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30537-6 · Cited by 1,148
Cited by
Wuyts, F. L., Bodt, M. S. D., Molenberghs, G., Remacle, M., Heylen, L., Millet, B., Lierde, K. V., Raes, J., & Heyning, P. H. V. D. (2000) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jslhr.4303.796 · Cited by 578
The apraxia of speech rating scale: A tool for diagnosis and description of apraxia of speech
Strand, E. A., Duffy, J. R., Clark, H. M., & Josephs, K. (2014) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.008 · Cited by 279
The Effect of Perceptual Training on Inexperienced Listeners' Judgments of Dysphonic Voice
Eadie, T. L., & Baylor, C. R. (2006) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.007 · Cited by 254
Differential Diagnosis of Pediatric Speech Sound Disorder
Dodd, B. (2014) · Current Developmental Disorders Reports · doi:10.1007/s40474-014-0017-3 · Cited by 236
Theodoros, D. G., Hill, A. J., & Russell, T. G. (2016) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2015_ajslp-15-0005 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Kent, R. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 7-23
- ISSN
- 1058-0360 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9110
- OpenAlex
- W2050966398
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hearing and Believing: Some Limits to the Auditory-Perceptual Assessment of Speech and Voice Disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/1058-0360.0503.07
- The paper
- Kent, R. D. (1996). Hearing and Believing: Some Limits to the Auditory-Perceptual Assessment of Speech and Voice Disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0503.07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.